this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
52 points (93.3% liked)

Apple

18025 readers
216 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JaymesRS@midwest.social 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How many consumers who are buying phones at the non-pro levels use their port for anything other than charging more than 5-times a year?

I’d bet those that do would be buying the Pro line of phones which are faster.

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This has been my thought the whole time. Anyone that needs USB3 was already going to get the Pro anyway.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, justify locking a feature behind spending more money. As the corporate overlords intended.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As far as I can tell, it’s a minuscule number. Apple has done everything in their power to remove the need to ever plug into another device. Backups are handled with iCloud, files are done in iCloud (although file management is pretty poor on iOS) and pretty much everything else can be done without needing to connect to iTunes anymore.

The only usecase I can think of is developers needing physical port access (though at this point I wouldn’t be surprised if you could remotely connect a device) and maybe anyone who’s moving large numbers of files on and off their phone (which doesn’t seem to be terribly well supported anyways)

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apple engineer here, you don’t need the physical port for that either. You need only plug in your device once, to pair it with Xcode, and from then on out you can run and debug the app over the network.

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly this part is cool. Much as I do enjoy Android’s development process, just getting started with iOS development is cleaner. Every time I start an Android project, I have to fight with drivers, fight with ADB, etc. Test Flight and Co. are really well supported tools.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can't think of the last time I transferred a file to my phone using the USB port. Photos get backed up automatically. Everything is wireless.

[–] SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The last time I tried to copy multiple large videos from iPhone to PC it failed multiple times so I ended up just syncing with dropbox.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 3 points 1 year ago

Oh, you did remind me of a time I used a USB cable to transfer data. It was all the assets for a game that I was datamining. It failed multiple times as well, so I had to write a script to restart it every time it failed until it got it all.

I can't remember why I didn't use wifi for that.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I transfer music to my phone all the time with the cable. I own a phone with a large amount of storage and have a $10 a month plan with limited data though. Still like to have music on it for workouts/the car. So I'm a weirdo.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The weird thing about it is that iPhones tend to be used by photography enthusiasts because it can shoot in ProRes and RAW, which create huge files. That shit can take forever to transfer over lightning port speeds.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

This isn’t a huge surprise. All the reports said they’re just repinning the lightning chipset