this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
200 points (85.2% liked)

Fediverse memes

290 readers
484 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
200
submitted 11 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by Blaze@feddit.org to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk
 

Context

The main arguments for people to defederate are

  • "Embrace, extend, and extinguish" strategy: https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html
  • A potential federation with Threads (should Thread decide to implement it) would overwhelm Lemmy/Mbin/Piefed with millions of users (compared to the 40k monthly current active users), transforming those platforms into a threaded version of Facebook
  • Defederating preventively costs nothing
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Five@slrpnk.net 18 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Threads.net federation status on major Lemmy instances based on blocklist info:

Also, in memoriam:

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 94 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

I have yet to see any threads content anyway.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The best if you don't have to. If you thought Twitter's nonexistent moderation was bad, then get ready for Meta's moderation.

People can post trans suicide memes, people can post outright hate speech, no action. Call a "moderate conservative" a "mean person", racist, etc., action within 24 hours, multiple-day ban.

[–] scott@authorship.studio 1 points 1 hour ago

@ZILtoid1991

If you thought Twitter’s nonexistent moderation was bad, then get ready for Meta’s moderation.

To be fair, there is no global moderation on the fediverse. Anyone can start up their own instance with their own rules, or lack thereof. But that is also a plus since you or your server administrator decide how to moderate content, rather than depending on the decisions of some mega company's moderation team.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 15 points 7 hours ago

So it's working.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 31 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly. I still don't know what the whole kerfuffle is about.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 35 points 10 hours ago

One concern is that since threads has a massive userbase and similar volume of content, it is basically a full reservoir and when it starts to federate content it will be like the dam bursting. Even if there is a need for a user on lemmy.world to do something to start federating content, like subscribing to communities, but all it would take is a bot that subscribes to a bunch of popular content to both fill the All feed and prompt a massive number of API calls.

If the hardware is up to the task, the other concern is the threads content overwhelming existing communities, and since a bunch of meta content is bot driven and malicious that would be a crazy amount of moderation that is likely needed to keep it from causing issues and driving away the existing userbase.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 24 points 9 hours ago

Lemmy is niche and therefore is heavily populated by techies but more specifically lemmy is open source so these techies are specifically the type who like open source stuff. Threads and the corporation responsible for it have a financial incentive to oppose open source projects like this. So the community most ideologically tied to lemmy want nothing to do with it. They want to preserve their space that they have made as free of the influences of capital as possible. The very existence of threads is a threat.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 38 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Hexbear? EW.

Also they don't actually federate anything, especially not with Lemmy as federation with Lemmy is fucked up even with mastodon, misskey and basically all the other services. Kbin was the only somewhat working other service, but from what I've seen its abandoned.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I came here to tell you that !art@hexbear.net is actually quite nice. I was going to say, by the way, that I also went there to talk with them about politics recently, got about the reaction you'd expect, and peaced out, but as long as you don't do that, you can enjoy the nice artwork.

And then, I realized that I haven't seen any of the art for a few days.

Yep! My whole instance is defederated, I think. I wrote a total of five messages.

I think they're a little thin-skinned lol.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago

I also went there to talk with them about politics recently, got about the reaction you’d expect, and peaced out, but as long as you don’t do that, you can enjoy the nice artwork.

Not worth it.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

Absolutely not worth it and I'm staying in my savespace they defederated. We are better.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 19 points 9 hours ago

At the moment, it is more a gesture of support for our micro-blogging cousins but still...

[–] Fitik@fedia.io 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Thread does not currently federate with link aggregators (Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed)

It federates with MBin, recently Fedia defederated Threads, but before that I could follow and interact with Threads accounts, and it actually worked

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 4 points 7 hours ago

Thanks for the clarification

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 25 points 11 hours ago (8 children)

I'm pretty sure LW is trying to be Threads, or at least grow into some version of it. Why is, as you said, a mystery.

https://fedihosting.foundation/lw-team/#org-chart

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have 2 possible theories on that:

  1. They want the federation to be all encompassing. Like a giant forum for corporations, governments and the common people. Sort of like a FOSS mall with a post office, community center and library included.

  2. They're ran and/or owned ultimately by a Reddit or Threads type company.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 7 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

Someday I will write my master list of unfounded Fediverse conspiracy theories.

I was going to say that I didn't have one for lemmy.world, so that would be a good addition, but I realized that I do: LW is being run by the Russians, as a cheap way to get a solid foothold over a new sector of social media, and that's why there was that moment in time where Youtube was giving out Russian-language descriptions for all the videos that got posted to LW.

I have no evidence and it seems hilariously unlikely, but so does "Our Dutch sysadmin decided to host the server in Finland of all places, and then on top of that, Google decided to start handing out Russian-language descriptions when people accessed Youtube from Finland. And then, as soon as we found out about it, Google suddenly fixed it for us."

My theory would also explain why the admin team makes certain perplexing decisions like pushing so hard to make a safe space for the disinfo accounts and then forbidding anyone from calling them out.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 hours ago

sheesh, must be bad if even hexbear is doing it!

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

We gotta avoid meta collecting data on the users of the fediverse.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 hours ago

Oh no, imagine someone being able to see data that you publicly posted on the internet!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Bruh you know you can literally just download any lemmy data right now?

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's why I didn't mention data collection in the reasons. Everything here can be parsed by thousands of instances. The issue is the EEE, and flooding the platform with millions of users coming from Facebook

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Literally all they would have to do is spin up a generic instance with like, one subscriber, federate, and then just kick back and wait. But yeah, fuck threads. .World should de-federate.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 4 points 7 hours ago

Question if that's possible, especially if they really start a search engine, but yeah at least do not hand over the data on a golden plate

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The threads hate is so fucking stupid. Companies getting involved with Lemmy would be awesome, mostly because it's a replacement for discord. The whole EEE thing is FUD, open source largely solved that problem. The people with control aren't just going to give Meta they keys anyway. Some corporate involvement could help solve some real issues with making hosting easier, reducing storage needs, and increasing federation throughput.

Corporate instances would be awesome to add to my feed for the things I want to see and it would be a way to attract people to get the more niche communities. The tools already exist for the people who don't want to see that content. If for example steam community discussions became Lemmy communities that would be a huge win for the platform.

Also threads isn't even the same federation model as Lemmy anyway and it's unlikely to ever actually federate to here anyway.

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 hour ago

Threads hate isn’t stupid. Consider for a moment the literally dozens of people online without FB or Insta accounts. That is a choice. It’s nice to have somewhere that doesn’t have those users, with that groomed content, pumped for profit. Meta exists to make money - the Zuckdroid wants a finger in the fediverse pie to maximise profit for the share holders; not because he’s gone all in and techno-philanthropy. Having said that, the dilution of quality and nuance his user base “could” bring is the real worry though.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 4 points 2 hours ago

Lemmy is a replacement for discord???

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 1 points 6 hours ago

So if Meta continues to share defederated without acknowledgement from the source, wouldn’t that just put lemmy and mastodan on top?

load more comments
view more: next ›