this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
449 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59116 readers
3013 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 67 points 6 days ago

YouTube/Google and hiding data from the end-user, name a better duo.

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Fucking YouTube is at it again, and you know what? I think Susan make a better YouTube CEO than the current retarded CEO, Luckily Revanced is a thing hopefully they patch it if it come true

[–] notous@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Screw this, mainstream websites are constantly trying to do everything they can to influence public opinion every day. First dislike button second this.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 269 points 1 week ago (8 children)

It’s already really difficult to engage with the content you want to see, but now they’re also taking away the only immediately noticeable metric of a successful video? Genuinely just why

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Personally I find the highest viewed videos on YT to be the absolute shittiest ones.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, that’s kinda the problem too

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 251 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

They removed the star system a long time ago. They removed the down votes again a few years back.

They want their algorithm to be the only thing that decides whether you watch a video or not.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 151 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That'll work excellent for all those people trying to find tutorial videos for 'XYZ' when you have no verification data to determine whether it's even a legit tutorial.

[–] calabast@lemm.ee 75 points 1 week ago (6 children)

People who watch tutorial videos only get on, watch the video and then leave. How are they supposed to make tons of advertising revenue from that? No, we must sacrifice that class of video from the platform, in pursuit of the almighty dollar.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I mean you joke, but they're literally doing that to reaction video channels. MXRPlays had his entire channel deleted, despite having millions of subscribers. It was clear for years that someone at youtube had a grudge against them.

Especially since they deleted their channel. Gave strikes to all their videos, and took the videos down. Buuuuuuut, someone ELSE illegally reuploaded their content, and they can't even report the video because their channel is deleted. The illegal re-uploads have no strikes, no issues, the content stay up, and some OTHER person makes money off of MXRPlays years old content.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Too hard to manipulate the algorithm with ai spam, disguised ads and propaganda if users can see all the videos at the top of their recommended feed have 20 views.

You must only view what the Corporation approves.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 122 points 1 week ago (2 children)

YT Exec - /rips massive line of coke off Intern's ass/ - "Remove View Count"

YT Engineer - "But Sir, users will hate that. It will actively make the user experience worse"

YT Exec - "That's the goddamn point!"

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

This is inane but damn if it didn’t give me a good laugh :D

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 1 week ago

sounds like another job for the return youtube dislikes guy

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Seems like a sure way to lose my engagement. I don't understand what Google thinks they're getting out of this except for flooding you with more ads between video recommendations at the cost of people actually watching anything and using the damn website.

Between removing the dislike counter, a defect search bar that shoves garbage down your throat, recommendations of decreasing quality on my end and shorts (which I hesitantly gave a try but ultimately lost all interest in because it remained mostly low effort content despite my efforts to train my algorithm), this is just another reason why I find myself spending more time enjoying other things lately.

Maybe I am just out of touch, but I smell another bubble bursting when I look at how enshittified all major web services are simultaneously becoming.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I guess I’d rather have it than not have it, but I don’t really understand how it would make YT unusable to me if I didn’t know how many other people viewed a video. How often are you using those numbers to make important decisions between videos about what to watch? I tend to go by the topic and subscribe to creators whose videos I like. Very occasionally I might be looking for a guide to an obscure level in an obscure game and there may be 3 similar looking videos about it, but one has 200 views and the others have single digits, and I agree in that situation it means something. But otherwise I just never pay attention to it. What do I care if 2000 or 200,000 people watched a video that looks interesting to me? Some creators I subscribe to have just a couple hundred followers. I don’t care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sag@lemm.ee 73 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Next What???? Removing Title, Only Thumbnail.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Gemini Ai makes up a title for you.

That's as cursed as I can make it.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

The endgame will be Gemini generating videos based on the information they've harvested off you.

[–] simonced@lemmy.one 4 points 6 days ago

The title will be text to speech on mouse over.
The future is here.

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Removing the homepage entirely, replacing the entire UI with the shorts-style format of "view video right now, tap button to see next/previous video". If you want a specific video, you must search for it.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Remove the user generated videos. Only title, videoads and comments allowed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 73 points 1 week ago (5 children)

In 5 years:

Youtube tests small ads in the top corner during video playback.

In 10 years:

Youtube tests small increase in size of well established corner ads.

In 15 years:

Youtube graciously allows video playback inbetween ads

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

If you count the little banner text ads then they already have the ads in the top right corner of the videos and have had those for years.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not to mention their “1080p” streams look worse than 2013 480p streams. The site is a dumpster fire.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

That's why you need to pay for premium so you can get the 1080p premium bitrate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

Return youtube view counts, coming soon

load more comments
view more: next ›