this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
355 points (94.5% liked)

Science Memes

11021 readers
4886 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 127 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If 90% of the population call them seagulls, and 99% of the population understand what you mean when you say "seagull", then yes, they are actually called seagulls

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 55 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It's like what I say to bother botanists:

If half of the fruits with "berry" in their name don't fit your definition of berry, you need a new definition

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty sure botanists are aware that the same word can have different meaning outside of their scientific field. The people actually bothered by this are pedants who read about it on the internet, not people who studied botany.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

A slight distinction:

The people actually bothered by this are the friends of pedants who read about it on the internet, not people who studied botany.

The pedants aren't bothered, they're elated they get to display faux superiority, I'm the one bothered by them!

Lol

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago

Well, no, there's nothing wrong with the definition of berry, but there would be something wrong about a botanist being annoyed with someone using the colloquial definition of berry.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What if I told you that words can have different meanings in different contexts? Just because the same word can be used to refer to different things depending on whether its used in everyday or scientific speech doesn't mean either usage is "wrong".

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Context specific definitions are the bane of my autistic existence. Figuring out context is a waste of brainpower that could be better used having anxiety over situations that aren't going to happen.

/Completely serious, but not quite as strongly as worded here.

[–] groknull@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

So I take it no one should mention that in astrophysics anything heavier than helium is a metal

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Doesn't change that it was a bad idea to borrow a generic term for small sweet fruits to refer to a specific botanical feature. Not just bad, but completely unnecessary and frankly, simply, a bit stupid.

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Annoy naturalists with these other animal names too: Jellyfish, crawfish, starfish, Killer Whale, Canadian Geese, and American Buffalo.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The buffalo thing pisses me off the most. Entire cultures are defined by that animal and it's incredibly significant to the history of the prairies and the continent as a whole. So it seems to me pretty disrespectful to go to these people and go "um actually what you've been calling this animal for centuries is wrong actually because Linnaeus or whatever"

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Killer whale is orca which is a predatory whale.

[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Canada Goose

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

wtf who's beefing with starfish

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Should we add an exception when it comes to technical discussions?

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you're an ornithologist writing a scientific paper, you'd presumably be using a genus + species in Latin rather than any colloquial name anyway, while still acknowledging that they fall under the umbrella term "seagull" for most people. But I'm a descriptive linguist, rather than prescriptive, and that's really what this meme is about (it's not about seagulls)

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Birds actually have scientific common names and it's completely acceptable to refer to them with those names. They even have standardized bird abbreviations using those names, like Red-tailed Hawk is RTHA. They of course use the latin names too, and those have their own abbreviations (Buteo jamaicensis is BUTJAM) but the common names are handier.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Here's the thing. You said a "jackdaw is a crow."

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a scientist who studies crows, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls jackdaws crows. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "crow family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of Corvidae, which includes things from nutcrackers to blue jays to ravens.

So your reasoning for calling a jackdaw a crow is because random people "call the black ones crows?" Let's get grackles and blackbirds in there, then, too.

Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A jackdaw is a jackdaw and a member of the crow family. But that's not what you said. You said a jackdaw is a crow, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the crow family crows, which means you'd call blue jays, ravens, and other birds crows, too. Which you said you don't.

It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago

mmmm, buttjam

[–] Rooskie91 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Noooo then how are we going to get memes like this?

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I enjoy having semi-serious discussions about nonsense like this, so I appreciate RubberElectron's reply calling me out

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 72 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

The very first line of the Wikipedia entry on Gull says: "Gulls, or colloquially seagulls, are seabirds of the family Laridae in the suborder Lari. ". Colloquially speaking all gulls are seagulls.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gull

The entry lists 54 species of Gull, and indeed from a pedantic perspective, none of their common names are "seagull". Nor are any of their binomial names Latin for "seagull". But there is Larus pacificus, either very calm or associated with the ocean of the same name. Also there is Larus atlanticus, and Larus Marinus (pretty dang close).

[–] bisby@lemmy.world 71 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as a Gull, is in fact, Sea/Gull, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Sea plus Gull. Gull is not an categorization unto itself, but rather another component of a full identity made useful by the kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species components comprising a full identification as defined by its scientific classification.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

LOL, now do the Navy Gulls copypasta or "here's the thing..."

[–] weariedfae@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Something something jackgull

[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago

My fellow citizens, we got him.

[–] topz@beehaw.org 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

In Swedish Larus Marinus is called "Havstrut" which would translate to Seagull but I guess that doesn't count.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

50 species of gulls and every last one of them is a cunt.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 weeks ago

Fucking love seagulls. Grew up at the beach, gulls everywhere. They used to dig in our trash cans and we had to put heavy weights on the lids. Still fucking love em. They're awesome, amazing trash birds who give zero fucks. I have seen gulls fully steal food from people's mouths. I've seen them sit on windshields and refuse to move so you can drive, including just allowing the wipers to fwap into them repeatedly.

Seagulls aren't cunts. Seagulls serve cunt, and I love them for it.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They most certainly are not. Make friends with one and they will bring you presents. https://lemmings.world/post/14253921

[–] ArtieShaw@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've seen a gull eat a dead pigeon in the town square. I don't think I want their presents any more than the ones my cats think I do.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Gulls have to eat.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wikipedia on Larus marinus, or the great black-backed gull:

The scientific name is from Latin. Larus appears to have referred to a gull or other large seabird. The specific name marinus means "marine", or when taken together, "sea gull".

If that's not a seagull I don't know what is.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

LoL, indeed it's not tho', it's the Great Black-Backed Gull. Damn those taxonomists!!!

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah but like, my dog is a dog but it's also a Labrador and also has a name. The great black-backed gull is also known as Larus marinus which means sea gull, and is also commonly referred to as a seagull. By what notion is that not a seagull?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

By the simple minded notion of my sense of humor. ;-) Any more hares you'd like to split?

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If we split a hare we'll both go hungry cause hares are small and I'm vegetarian

[–] phdeeznuts@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

Wow who said anything about eating it? You display it on the mantelpiece.

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why does a seagull fly over the sea?

Because if they flew over the bay they would be bagels!

This joke echoes in my brain thanks to this one PBS commercial break snippet from my childhood. You're welcome

[–] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I heard this joke for the first time a few weeks back on an episode of The Penguin. :D

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 19 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Achkchually, a pineapple is neither a pine, nor an apple.

It's actually an ananananas.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Velonie@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Bonjour, allô, salut!

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, but ananananas-pen doesn't have quite the same ring now does it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 13 points 3 weeks ago

That anon's name? Steven Seagullible

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 9 points 3 weeks ago

From my experience, they're "Hanging around outside the chip shop" gulls.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No one actually loves seagulls, but that's got nothing to do with the fact there is no seagull.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 10_0@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Now I know this, I will be crying every time I go to the ocean

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh hey flying vermin.

load more comments
view more: next ›