this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
315 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3729 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A petition calling for a Senate investigation into the justice has gained traction after a series of controversial rulings.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Drusas@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] exohuman@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that Thomas is still a justice astounds me. It shows the complacency our country has.

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aside from complete and total revolution, what do you propose be done about a corrupt supreme court justice?

[–] acunasdaddy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Article says there is already one for Thomas that has over 1.3 millions signatures

[–] exohuman@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The House and Senate can check the court with the President’s support.

  • Justices can be impeached by a 2/3 majority in the Senate.
  • They can have term limits introduced to stop lifetime appointments.
  • They can have the court size shrank, removing some members.
  • They can have the court size increased, making the individual vote count less.
  • They could introduce a rule to require a supermajority in the court to declare a law unconstitutional.
  • Impose new ethics rules for justices (thereby removing the corrupt justice).

So if we want to peacefully fix the court we need a Congress that can work with the President to do that.

Sources:

https://www.lwv.org/blog/not-so-absolute-power-supreme-court

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/term-limits-a-way-to-tackle-the-supreme-courts-crisis-of-legitimacy/

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47382#:~:text=Court%20can%20declare%20a%20law,recordings%20of%20Supreme%20Court%20proceedings.

[–] martyc3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also the Court may have overstepped their authority. There needs to be a discussion about the limits of their pronouncements. They do not sit above all of government. There's checks and balances in the system.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s checks and balances in the system.

There used to be.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Do online petitions ever do anything other than give moveon more people to spam?

[–] skellener@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Abso-fucking-lutely!! ✊

[–] Elden_Potato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The current government can't even agree that Nazi's are bad, it is next to hopeless that they will come together and create the new precedent needed to out these corrupt assholes. People have short memories, this situation has been over a decade in the making and now we reap what we sow. RBG fucked us by not retiring despite being old as cancer ridden dirt so Obama could sit a replacement and that combo'd with the country losing its collective mind and voting for Trump caused two dark age justices to be appointed that we just have to deal with. So buckle up I guess, this isn't getting any better any time soon.

load more comments
view more: next ›