this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
714 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
1979 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 160 points 2 months ago (22 children)

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.

https://phdn.org/archives/www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/documents/osssection3pt1.htm

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 58 points 2 months ago

It’s Cluster B. Alternative reality. Never to blame. They almost need enemies to work on to be themselves. Gaslight or verbally abuse those in disagreement lest your private reality break. No empathy. Chases power over scenarios.

We’re living inside the reality of a mental illness. And because it goes to the highest office, the fuckery is exponentially more.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

so basically fascism.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 112 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Read the whole and thing and, wow. It's just unbelievable to me that people can support this man so fervently.

I guess it's what happens when you give people permission to be completely selfish and devoid of empathy. He's a fucking psychopath.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s what happens when you get your news in parts of the country where Fox and Sinclair own the airwaves. They make immigrants and democrats seem terrifying.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

add in some social media for the younger people and bam, recipe for fascism.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not psychopathy. But narcissistic personality disorder. If you know anyone who has lived with one, they can tell you it’s on the verge of psychopathy.

It’s crazy behavior and crazy talk because it’s mental illness, probably somewhere around 60 years untreated mental illness. And hallmarks of NPD are maintaining a personal alternative reality, mentally tearing apart anyone disagreeing with that alternative reality, and no empathy.

I’m sick to death of no one talking about it and calling it what it is. We can talk about Biden’s dementia but not this?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Its just standard brainwashing. It’s not even complicated. It’s all right out in the open.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 85 points 2 months ago (17 children)

Is he aware that Germany lost?

[–] waz@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I expect he is a slow reader. He may not have gotten to that part of the book yet.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He said his favorite book is Mein.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Maybe he has good associations with that word because when he said lo mein at a Chinese restaurant a plate of greasy noodles arrived

[–] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 2 months ago

Reminds me of the theory explaining why he say other countries are emptying their "insane asylums".

He was told immigrants are seeking asylum, has zero clue what that means, and determined that it meant countries are emptying mental hospitals and sending their patients to the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure he would consider murdering millions of Mexicans as a win, even if it ends with a bullet to his temple.

[–] Event_Horizon@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

Ya know I realise this is complete conspiracy theory.

However, I'm still willing to give a 2-5% chance that if Trump gets back into power, within the last 12-18 months of his presidency he'll declare a special operation into North Mexico to 'secure the border', 'stop the illegal immigrants' and 'remove the drug cartels'.

Then he'll claim it's too dangerous to hold the election, or not appropriate, or whatever excuse because of the special operation. And then he'll postpone the election with the approval of the SC as a presidential duty and therefore not illegal.

And I know this is insane but every time I ask myself "would trump attempt something like this?" The answer is always "yes"

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 months ago

If someone tells you they're a Nazi, believe them and treat them accordingly.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Hitler ended up firing most of his generals. Then he shot himself.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

Hitler's best generals tried to kill him.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago

Unfortunately this did not happen very quickly. The years leading up to it were pretty awful.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Bad ones, weak enough to listen to me"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I read this entire article, and it made me sad. Because the guy's probably going to win. The people who need to read this article simply won't, and they will continue to believe what he tells them.

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The people who need to read the article would, and then complain that it's all lies to denigrate Trump. It's a sick joke that I have family members who, "respect the military and those who serve", but continue to tout Trump as a Messianic figure to save America. The brainwashing/rot is real.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 14 points 2 months ago

They're going to agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago

Let's help make sure he doesn't win. Make sure that dems turn out to vote!

Help volunteer for dems around you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Goddamn. And he's potentially president a second time.

Trump has already caused significant damage. If he wins, we can expect things to get really bad.

But even if he loses, look at what he's done. He truly believes personal gain is the only thing someone should ever value. There is no justice for someone like that, other than taking it all away. Forcing him to realize that humanity has only survived because we can work together for collective gain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Can't wait to hear how this gets sane washed.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

"He meant to say genitals!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

what's his obsession with ballsacks about? wasn't he just talking about Arnold Palmers junk, now this? kinda sus...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There was no evidence of election irregeluarities in 2020, and Trump's "deny everything, and always claim victory" has included admissions by him that there was no evidence, but the philosophy was more important. Generals supporting sending an army to assist insurection, or other unconstitutional acts such as rounding up all Haitians in a city, because a neighbour reported their cat missing, with suspicion of one neighbour (cat came back next day).

This is as serious of a concern as his promise to provide absolute immunity to all police abuse. Israel's token concession to ICJ to prosecute rape torture of prisoners, would turn out the same in USA, if Trump supremacists destroy everything with immunity, and those not happy about Trump fascism get fascisted.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

There was plenty of evidence of election irregularities. People have gone to jail for stuffing extra votes for Trump.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He means the ones that got tired of hitler and tried to kill him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Don't you think he looks tired?

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wow, tankies may actually drop the mask and openly support their orange hero

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

No problem dude, we'll put a few of them on your upcoming juries.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 months ago

As long as they are like von Stauffenberg I would be okay with it.

[–] Disgracefulone 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Personally none of the things this article says surprise me. But unfortunately, the author doesn't seem to provide any sources for Trumps statements, only the denials of those statements. Idk if people are just scared and want to remain anonymous or what but it loses integrity when people refuse to identify themselves or rather when A reporters article doesn't have sources like this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

peace loving guy who definitely won't start an unwinnable war

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

This is what the GOP wants for our future.

[–] joel1974@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

His MAGA flock will love him more. He is sticking it the Liberals. Making them cry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Why? There's not a world war. Unless he's planning for one.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

But he's NOT a Nazi!

load more comments
view more: next ›