this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
353 points (97.3% liked)

World News

38968 readers
2684 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 180 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (11 children)

No music, no images... two things that have defined Human culture for millennia. The Taliban must really love leading a miserable existence.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 76 points 3 weeks ago

Just wait for the exceptions for "spiritual leaders" and government officials.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 56 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As long as it means they can control others, they are happy.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 20 points 3 weeks ago

Well, not happy as such

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 3 weeks ago

The Republican party is salivating at the thought

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 weeks ago

Well, I know less about music, but iconoclasm is a pretty traditional feature of Islam. That's why they have all the crazy geometrical art everywhere.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 90 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Make sure that mountain is free of any trees before taking that scenic picture.

This essentially bans all photography - it's fucking weird.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 53 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Afghan Art exhibition:
Here's a picture of a brick.

Afghan religious leader:
Should we execute him? Just to be safe you know!

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Was there a fly on the brick?

Also, where are we on the matter of fungi?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And what about bacteria? Hope they disinfect the brick beforehand.

And viruses? Do viruses live?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

Quick, check the ancient religious texts for guidance on viruses.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 weeks ago

See, that's what we need to settle the debate about the biological status of viruses. A fatwa.

Maybe they can decide between tabs and spaces next.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, I guess we better execute him, the whole thing smells fishy, like an attempt to oppose authority.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

"Smells fishy?" Are you evoking imagery of a living thing with your analogy?

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

Get them - err, I mean get that thing which may or may not be a person... but, if they are currently a person, I'm sure it's just a very temporary condition.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I assume that guy on the poster is dead, then?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I bet you're not allowed to picture dead people either ...

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Might have bacteria in that photo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 10 points 3 weeks ago

Zombies & Vampires only.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I really, really wish the linked article explained more. What are they playing at? This is such a confusing level of control.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 59 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's a radical religious thing. Images are imperfect imitations of God's perfect work, therefore, they are blasphemy.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Okay but what about the image cast on our retinas through our eyeballs that we use to see?

Those are imperfect imitations of reality also. What's their stance on those images...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

But apparently written religious works or talking about god's work is perfect, or that would be banned too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

God doesn't want you to mix fabrics or eat certain foods on certain days. "Confusing level of control" is on brand.

It's not about making sense though. It's about making you do what they want so that you know who is in control.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Not mixing fabrics and certain food practices were originally based on lived experience, like safety guidance, before getting coopted by religion. Kosher practices avoid cross contamination, and mixed fabrics could have something to do with temperature regulation in desert areas where it swings between extreme heat and cold daily. Or it could have existed to discourage lying about prodict quality by those who would sneak in poor quality materials.

When religion got ahold of these concepts they were absolutely twisted into controlling people.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 3 weeks ago

According to wikipedia, that isn't even a problem within the Quran itself, but rather a hadith (oral tradition) from some other fellow: "Sahih Bukhari explicitly prohibits the making of images of living beings, challenging painters to "breathe life" into their images and threatening them with punishment on the Day of Judgment."

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago

taliban's oppression is not a rabbit hole you want to go down

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

So... TV news will just be text on a screen?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I suppose TV wouldn't make much sense under those circumstances.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But they still have TV, right? They did the last time the Taliban was in charge. I remember a news segment about it way back when the war started. The programming was mostly a bunch of religious stuff and their idea of news. So I guess no more news? Or no more TV? Or just text...

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

The russian way is to set up extremely restrictive laws covering everyone as guilty, so a governing body can use them to charge everyone they want. I guess, talibs learnt some of that wisdom visiting Kremlin while being a designated terrorist organization here, kek - and this status would get lifted in coming months.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago

I suspect some of them might still have cell phones with internet. I wonder if they'll also force people to use text images as avatars on twitter or something

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

That's accurate to historical Islamic practice, unlike a lot of their crazy shit, but nobody else does it because it's going to be insanely difficult to work with.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck's sake.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

😂

What?!

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Obviously I'm not pro Taliban or this, but one thing that has been amusing me has been the US institute for peace decrying the fact that they outlawed poppy production again because it increases poverty. Western media on the subject is a mixture of it's bad and it won't work (they've actually reduced poppy production by over 90 percent though). Pre war we were justifying sanctions due to heroin production, post war it actually increased under American administration and the fragile kleptocracy we encouraged(which "banned" poppy production), and now it's bad they're slashing and burning poppy fields.

https://www.usip.org/publications/2023/06/talibans-successful-opium-ban-bad-afghans-and-world

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

So just kill everything before taking the picture.

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Now it's just a bunch of religious fascists trying to one up each other.

Give it enough time and they have implemented so many rules, no rule is relevant any more

Are you Taliban and want someone dead, but frustrated with your fundamentalist movement's pesky adherence to the rule of law? Upset at the heretic you can't quite get proof of? Overbearing parents trying to arrange another marriage?

With new Taliban Ban on Images of Living Things®, you are back in the driver's seat. Just take a picture of your target. After it's done, the authorities will be practically begging you to murder that person to prevent the inevitable consequences, including the collapse of society and the rending of the fabric of space-time.

load more comments
view more: next ›