this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
215 points (96.1% liked)

Privacy

31982 readers
407 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know anything about cars.

Now that we have established that cars seriously undermine our privacy (look at the flurry of posts in this community in the last few hours), what can we do about it?

From a networking POV, if you remove the ability to connect to the Internet, it doesn't matter what the car is recording as long as you can ensure there is no physical tampering. Depending on who you are, this is a good idea, and doable for the most part (very few people have the technical knowledge to pull out the right chip from a car).

So, how do we achieve this? I implore the community to invite mechanical/car engineers who can help us on this matter, and to form methods to prevent vehicles from accessing the Internet without express consent from the user.

Thanks!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You could, but some antenna are printed onto circuit boards so disabling them without breaking the board entirely will be interesting.

With that Mozilla study out I hope some car manufacturers get sent some very pointed questions by government regulators.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.works 70 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Never thought I'd see a day where people feel compelled to circumsize their cars

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've always done this, it reduces the cars sensitivity so it lasts longer

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just ask the dealer to disconnect the modem upon purchase.

Better yet, refuse to buy shit you don't own and make this known. Go to the dealer force them to stand around while you read the privacy agreement. Use an attorney because they have stupid legal agreements. Waste everyone's time because they are the ones doing this to you. It must cost profit. Then walk away from this bullshit. Tell them why you are walking away.

All of this exists because people are too stupid to care. If you ignore this, you are one of them, and part of the problem. Legal agreements are theft and slavery. Signing them blindly is the stupidest thing you can ever do in your life. Anyone that needs a legal agreement for you to make a purchase is a worthless criminal. Signing their bullshit is saying you are okay with being their little slave bitch.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Waste everyone's time because they are the ones doing this to you

I agree with your intentions, but no, the person working at the car dealership is not doing this to you. That person is just trying to get by, they're not the MBA executive trying to squeeze every dollar out of humanity who you should be targeting

[–] rockstarpirate@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe not, but they are the one who keeps leaving me alone in their office for 15 minutes at a time to “go ask their manager” if our negotiations are ok and they are the one who pretends to settle on a price with me and then tries to hard-sell me on all sorts of useless addons. And at they end of the day they are the one that turns making a purchase into a 4-hour process.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It has to irritate the GM of the dealership enough to file a report and work its way up the chain to the top. Unfortunately this is capitalism. It is no different than the military in that it sucks to be the person at the bottom of the shit pile but they work for criminals. If they don't like it, quit working for criminals. Yes it is pervasive. But we are the problem. We are funding and enabling these people. You must make it extremely well known that you have money and you are not spending it because of this bullshit. No one else controls the market. We fund the entire thing with what we are willing to ignore and make excuses for. We must burn it to the ground too. That means stop being nice about the person working for the thief. Sorry; not sorry.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It has to irritate the GM of the dealership enough to file a report and work its way up the chain to the top.

I think you think the manager of a dealership is going to care a lot more than you think they will. More likely they're going to just ask you to leave after you start acting like a dick to their staff.

You must make it extremely well known that you have money and you are not spending it because of this bullshit.

By causing a scene you are going to affect no change, more likely you'll end up being mocked on Tik Tok. Write a letter to corporate explaining your decisions, sure, or petition for state or federal legislation; otherwise spend your money elsewhere. Only by funding alternatives are you going to impact the market outside of regulation

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I didn't say cause a scene. I spent nearly a decade painting cars for dealers. I have had close dealings with used car managers and general managers more than most people. Yes, any possible excuse about cars not selling over this kind of issue will be a leverage point that they will use when it comes to inventory. Just one sale lost over this will end up getting documented at most large dealers. All you need to do is read the document and say you are not okay with it and walk out because of it. No drama needed. This is intelligent. Signing your privacy away blindly is the only idiotic choice here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phar@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like the other person said, you are confusing the dealership and the manufacturer. This is the equivalent of those people that yelled at the teenagers working at chik filet. The dealership will just say they don't create those rules and you'd have to take it up with the manufacturer, then ask you to leave. If you don't leave and act like a jerk, they'll just call the cops and have you escorted off premises.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] V4ty6BybVXjr@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It probably felt nice writing this, but it's useless in the real world for the vast, VAST majority of people. People need computers, they need phones and cars and they will get their data stolen and sold unless legislation steps in.

No car salesperson will waste their time standing over you as you read their bullshit legalese, come on, although I'm sure a lawyer will happily bill you to read it with you. Refuse to buy the car? Ok, no worries, cars are hot property right now, there's a dozen other suckers lining up who don:t care about Nissan's rummaging around in their business.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To put it simply, this may not even be something they can do legally. For instance, when the mach E came out they were having serious electrical issues. The electric battery has it's own junction box. So much current was flowing through the contacts that they ended up fusing themselves open or closed. That basically disabled the vehicle. It was fixed with an OTA update. The update works through the same antennas and network you're talking about. If a vehicle can't receive an OTA and it affects the security of the vehicle/driver or poses a danger on public roads? Might be out of compliance with NHTSA or other authorities of similar spec in other countries.

https://www.nhtsa.gov/technology-innovation/vehicle-cybersecurity

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They have no rights to anything I own. What they ship the vehicle with is what I bought. I don't give a shit about anything anyone has to say about this. This feudalism bullshit is the absolute antithesis of freedom. I am not for sale.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wicked4wesome@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The manufacturer that i work for has esims built into every vehicle they build that cannot be removed without bricking the vehicle. I feel like this is pretty much industry standard at this point. They used to have a removable sim, but there was an esim along side that so you could not completely disconnect.

Edit: added words

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then block the signal with a Faraday Cage.

I see I'm getting downvoted for my comments about this, but the vehicle will not fail due to a lack of internet connection. Otherwise your vehicle would brick itself anytime you drive through a tunnel.

Go ahead, look it up. It's about as simple as wrapping the cellular device with metal screen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jesus. Any idea how old a car I'd have to buy to be realtively certain it wasn't phoning home?

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A lot of cars weren't connected until 2007-2010 unless they were luxurymodels or had OnStar or LoJack.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I wish I were a billionaire. I would literally start a company that made cars, phones, tech of all kinds on the basic premise that I don't give a fuck about you or your data. Make it private. Make it have no EULA that says anything beyond IP protections. Make it so consumers never have to worry about underhanded bullshit. Sure, I may not make tons of money, but I think I could be happy turning a small profit, paying employees fairly, and knowing that I am selling better products and undercutting all the assholes to send them careening directly I to the ground.

[–] dabu@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To become a billionaire you can't have a moral compass from the start so it's hard to imagine. I wish you well though, hope to buy one of your devices in future

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Disgusted_Tadpole@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, that might be why you’re not a billionaire

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Perhaps. I like to blame my crippling ADHD and lack of generational wealth.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

They thing to do is buy the rights to old designs, then open source them and sell them. It pisses me off no end I can't find system diagrams, schematics or source code to think I apparently "own". It keeps everyone ignorant and throwing stuff away to keep buying new. And now, with all going online, turns everything to a privacy nightmare . When the manufacture moves on to the next shiny, it will become part of internet of infected things botnets.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pm_me_some_serotonin@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sincerely, the best thing consumers can do is to drive dumb cars and use them for as long as possible (cars aren't like phones, and can work reliably for over a decade).

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

I just bike to work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wisely@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How exactly are cars connecting to the internet? Cell providers give them free data?

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the oems pay for it. some offer basic features for free but charge for features like music streaming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

It's generally not much data. A 1GB/mo SIM with ten years service can be had for less than a €10 if you're buying in bulk.

[–] StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I did something like that with my robot vacuum. I opened it up and ripped the soldered-on wifi card. Now I can't control it from my phone, but it can't phone home to Shark either. I was willing to risk it for a $400 robot vacuum, which I also happened to have a second defective one to practice on thanks to their return policy. I'm not sure if I'd attempt this on an electronics behemoth worth several thousands of dollars that I can't afford to lose.

[–] ScoobyDoo27@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Wouldn’t it have been easier to block it from accessing the internet through a firewall? And having a firewall helps you see what’s going on with the rest of your network.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I've had a thought I'd love to have a chance to try one day...

I'd like to see about not only disconnecting the antenna, but also basically wrap the cellular circuit module in metal screen, basically a crude Faraday Cage.

I've never had any chance to try such a thing, but I can only imagine it would probably do the trick.

Edit: For those that believe this will cause the vehicle to malfunction or even brick itself, have you never drove through a tunnel and found you lost Internet? Your vehicle won't stop functioning just because it lost Internet, it literally cannot do that.

That would be like the absolutely most unsafe thing any vehicle could ever do, to stop functioning because of an internet connection failure.

[–] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Or the car just doesn't start one day because it hasn't connected to its server in a month, forcing you to go to the dealer to fix it. Why do you so fervently believe a manufacturer wouldn't resort to tactics like this that they already employ for other systems? It's naive to think that manufacturers would never remotely disable a car in full or in part because it has been modified without authorization. If it profits them, they physically can, and no regulation prevents it, they will. Right to repair is a nice movement, that I fully support, but it's very very far from a universal right anywhere.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate to have to give you this upvote 👍

You're not wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kabobglance@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

So only thing is they might just store all the data locally and send it when they get reception again. Microsoft Word used to do this with "Aria"

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That might help in some situations, but some of the data is stored on hard drives and retrieved later, either at dealerships or when police "request" it. I think it would take some invasive modifying to really render your car private.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wrap the car in a large faraday cage? As a general rule it should be assumed that any device with a direct to internet connection capability has the potential to track the user, even of it's at a very course level like IP history that in theory could be made more precise if the ISP was inclined to keep tabs on a mac address.

My own vehicle has the ability, if not the subscription, to use one of those manufacturer sponsored satilite connections. Plenty of new vehicles have such things as paid DLC and just lock it up behind software but the hardware is still there. Physical interferance through disconnecting the relevant modules in a clean reversible way has potential for some enterprising sort to either open a school or a specialty repair shop. Now if we could just do something about the phone the driver has with them at the same time.

[–] iamhangry@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought they would disable my esim after the grace period was over, they gave me the option to pay for a subscription and I said “Hell no!”. But I guess I’m more valuable driving that thing than I thought. So yeah, probably only hacking it to disable the esim.

[–] dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Probably not without bricking your car. I doubt they are gonna tell you how to disable the telemetry, and with how connected the systems are these days, if you break something the whole thing stops working.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It would probably be easier and less damaging to find the fuse for the antenna/transmitter and pull it. That being said, it will probably stop the buttons on your keyfob from working. I think the keyless/touchless entry would still work. IIRC, that system works with active RFID near the door handles.

[–] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hate that this is even a consideration, but is that even legal?

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

As far as I'm aware, so long as you have purchased it fully with no payments left on it or any loans used to finance it, there is absolutely nothing the car manufacturer or the place you bought it from can do besides void any warranty you have on it. And that's if they figure out you removed the component.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Most vehicle head units are still running a low power version of Java 6 and have difficulty with nested levels of DNS CNAMES. I wonder what other problems that Java stack has that can be exploited?

load more comments
view more: next ›