180
submitted 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) by JustMarkov@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Telegram CEO Pavel Durov recently announced that Telegram would be handing over user data (such as phone numbers and IP adresses) to the authorities. Now it turns out that it has been doing so since 2018.

My previous post may have seemed to announce a major shift in how Telegram works. But in reality, little has changed.

Since 2018, Telegram has been able to disclose IP addresses/phone numbers of criminals to authorities, according to our Privacy Policy in most countries.

For example, in Brazil, we disclosed data for 75 legal requests in Q1 (January-March) 2024, 63 in Q2, and 65 in Q3. In India, our largest market, we satisfied 2461 legal requests in Q1, 2151 in Q2, and 2380 in Q3.

To reduce confusion, last week, we streamlined and unified our privacy policy across different countries.

Telegram was built to protect activists and ordinary people from corrupt governments and corporations — we do not allow criminals to abuse our platform or evade justice.

Full text of the post.📰 My previous post may have seemed to announce a major shift in how Telegram works. But in reality, little has changed.

🌐 Since 2018, Telegram has been able to disclose IP addresses/phone numbers of criminals to authorities, according to our Privacy Policy in most countries.

⚖️ Whenever we received a properly formed legal request via relevant communication lines, we would verify it and disclose the IP addresses/phone numbers of dangerous criminals. This process had been in place long before last week.

🤖 Our @transparency bot demonstrates exactly that. This bot shows the number of processed requests for user data.

✉️ For example, in Brazil, we disclosed data for 75 legal requests in Q1 (January-March) 2024, 63 in Q2, and 65 in Q3. In India, our largest market, we satisfied 2461 legal requests in Q1, 2151 in Q2, and 2380 in Q3.

📈 In Europe, there was an uptick in the number of valid legal requests we received in Q3. This increase was caused by the fact that more EU authorities started to use the correct communication line for their requests, the one mandated by the EU DSA law. Information about this contact point has been publicly available to anyone who viewed the Telegram website or googled “Telegram EU address for law enforcement” since early 2024. 

🤝 To reduce confusion, last week, we streamlined and unified our privacy policy across different countries. But our core principles haven’t changed. We’ve always strived to comply with relevant local laws — as long as they didn’t go against our values of freedom and privacy.

🛡 Telegram was built to protect activists and ordinary people from corrupt governments and corporations — we do not allow criminals to abuse our platform or evade justice.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] delirious_owl 3 points 1 hour ago

Why do you think they (and Signal) require phone numbers?

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 hour ago

I've been calling this out for years.

And every time, some commenter goes, "Nu uh, look at their website bro! It's super private!"

[-] zante@lemmy.wtf 25 points 6 hours ago

Everyone was told, from the outset , not to trust telegram. Amnesty International, the EFF, the cryptography community all said this as long as 10 years ago.

It’s actually pathetic to read a Russian talking about how it was “built for activists and not criminals “ . What a worm.

[-] delirious_owl 2 points 1 hour ago

I don't think Russians actually thought that. Its just that if they publicly pointed out the issues with Telegram and publicly suggested better alternatives, bad things would happen to them.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 6 points 5 hours ago

There are lots of things I could say to agree with you, but all I can do is gesture helplessly.

[-] xiao@sh.itjust.works 69 points 9 hours ago

Telegram was built to protect activists and ordinary people from corrupt governments and corporations — we do not allow criminals to abuse our platform or evade justice.

Criminals according to what standard ? In some countries, activism or sympathy with a cause is considered criminal behavior.

Evade justice ?? What justice is he talking about? The justice of the United States of America, Chinese justice, or the justice of the nationalities he possesses?

Better to avoid this platform

[-] msage@programming.dev 1 points 32 minutes ago

Criminals like Edward Snowden I guess

[-] zante@lemmy.wtf 10 points 5 hours ago

As a Russian he should know better anyone the difference between an Activist and a criminal is one phone call from the FSB

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 15 points 9 hours ago

You are 100% correct!

When governments are corrupt; rebellion is the same as criminal, because you are going against the government. That is the whole problem.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 7 hours ago

PoliScie 101.

Even the US founders hinted at this issue, if not outright called it out and added some protections for the plebs via a few amendments... But normies got nothing to hide 🤡

[-] zingo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Criminals according to what standard ? In some countries, activism or sympathy with a cause is considered criminal behavior.

Exactly!

It is a slippery slope.

Even with services like Proton (big company in the privacy realm) etc, you can only fully trust yourself.

That's why documents are always client side encrypted before I send my data, to any cloud platform.

[-] boldsuck@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Even with services like Proton (big company in the privacy realm) etc, you can only fully trust yourself.

That’s why documents are always client side encrypted before I send my data, to any cloud platform.

Exactly. I will never understand why people have their secret GPG-key on services like Tuta or Proton instead of on their own devices. 😂

[-] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Justice he dicides on and can get away with.

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 19 points 8 hours ago

This is really simple. Use Signal or WIRE. Proton or maybe Tutanota for email.

Avoid garbage like Telegram and FB Messenger. Discord as well.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Wire isn't that great. Definitely avoid email as it is riddled with problems that aren't easily fixable despite what the email companies tell you.

Simplex Chat, Signal or possibly Matrix

[-] delirious_owl 1 points 1 hour ago

I use Wire. Its the best option right now. Better than SimpleX, Signal, and Matrix for many reasons

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 52 minutes ago

It really isn't though

It is less secure, less private and less user friendly and is run by a company who I question.

[-] delirious_owl 0 points 1 hour ago

Wire is better than those imho

[-] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 2 points 5 hours ago

Matrix is still good too, right?

[-] delirious_owl 1 points 1 hour ago

Nah, it senda tons of unencrypted data, and you literally can't turn it off

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 7 hours ago

That's the privacy starter pack.

Mid level is Linux, DeGoogled pbone, and openwrt on the router

Make your fed work for you! You pay him a healthy wage for it 🐸

[-] davel@lemmy.ml -2 points 7 hours ago
[-] drwho@beehaw.org 7 points 5 hours ago

Articles like this go very far toward chasing people away from things that work and toward things that are dangerous.

Like Telegram.

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Oh boy, I never read the entire thing, but they can decrypt quantum encrypted messages, if that's true ( and I wish cryptography experts could debunk this ), if that's true, then the NSA has went too far with this open source honeypot.. perfection!

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

It is way better than Telegram

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 hours ago

Never trust a third party to keep your shit private. Especially if privacy is their main selling point.

[-] delirious_owl 1 points 1 hour ago

Foss code and client side encryption is fine.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This doesn't really compute. Society would collapse if nobody trusted "third parties", and your second phrase is just hyperbole.

It's more complex than that. The issue is money, and incentives, and how power is structured. A third party that you are paying or whose income is uncoupled to the profit motive, and preferably one that has both private and institutional stakeholders - well, if we choose not to trust them, then basically we can't trust anyone for anything. That would be a dark place to be.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 7 hours ago

basically we can't trust anyone for anyone. That would be a dark place to be.

Yes

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago

Telegram was built to protect activists and ordinary people from corrupt governments and corporation

Didn't they announce that they were no longer sending data to China about users participating in the Hong Kong unrest, implying that they were giving data.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
180 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

31384 readers
1104 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS