48
The maximum score is being banned from online communities? Some people get arrested and locked up for years for their perversions.
5 perfectly balanced and happy to explore any reasonable deviancy within the safety and privacy of a healthy and lawful relationship.
6.9
I'm very kinky but not very sexual. Like a 7-8 for kink but a 1 for sexuality.
I feel seen.
My bad, that's my kink.
6 or 7, tried pegging with my GF, wasn't offended enough by the experience to turn down her being giddy about doing it again.
Mildly worried that she's buying something brand new specifically to use on me.
We also get thirds every so often when we want to have an occasion
I reject the premise. Sexuality at its core is not, and in in my opinion cannot be perverted. Kinks may have social implications and be less preferred, but outside of overtly illegal acts and non-consensual harm suggesting something is perverted only acts to shame people for natural desires.
You're probably an 11 on the scale based on this post
Kinky is using a chicken feather. Perverted is using the whole damn chicken.
Even then it could have a wide range of pervertedness:
Is the chicken alive?
With or without feathers?
Raw or cooked?
If it's alive and plucked, it's just regular sex.
— Plato
Here is Plato's cloaca
- Diogenes
Costco rotisserie and being stepped on for OF. The more donations, the faster the model attempts to debone the bird using only their feet. At the end of each month, the top four contributors receive a jar of chicken tortilla soup made from the fermented pedi-shreddy chicken.
Do I need to roll out and perform a wellness check on you?
You're just trying to steal my pedi-shreddy!
alive, without feathers, cooked.
Aggressively rubs barbecue sauce on a rotisserie chicken
"Yeah you like that don't you, you slut!"
Identifying ones comfort zone is healthy for self awareness. Everyone has a comfort zone. The legality and external judgements of others are irrelevant to the question. The scale given does ground the question to cultural norms in an attempt to build a more translatable reference, but externalization is not the intended spirit of the question, nor is this some request to share one's kinks or reasoning. It is really a question of how one views their self awareness internally. In a way, this is a more accurate measure of an individual's conservatism internally.
In abstract, everyone has an answer to this question. This is not intended to offend, or in any way judge anyone. Feel free to object or abstain, but I did not ask the question to judge you or guilt you in any way; quite the opposite really.
The legality and external judgements of others are irrelevant to the question.
The concept of perversion is entirely based on the legality and external judgments of others, though. Even in your own example where 10 is being banned from communities as a result.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Most definitely a 10. Most people would find at least one thing that I like to be morally objectionable. I'm extremely into BDSM, and submissive to a fault. Like, I think that submission is better than sex. If there's a bad thing that can happen to someone, I've probably fantasized about it happening to me. Anything from public humiliation to erotic torture. I also enjoy basically every kind of taboo erotic roleplay. Ageplay, petplay, CNC, you name it. As long as I get to feel submissive and lose control that's all that matters. I'm also aroused by the thought of virtually any human bodily fluid in the right context, although I leave scat, blood, and vomit to fantasy.
In practice though, I'm not nearly as extreme as my fantasies. The kinkiest things I do with any regularity is light bondage, impact play, body worship, and verbal roleplay. My absolute favorite thing though, is humiliation. I remember having humiliation fantasies as young as 5 years old. Most of my kinky desires have some basis in an urge to feel humiliated. I've developed certain kinks solely because I found it particularly embarrassing to have them. Even typing this out this comment with the idea that people will read it and judge me is exciting.
that's more like an 8 tbh. i'm pretty much exactly the same way and i've seen more perverse stuff around.
Maybe a 10 if they also regularly do all that at sex parties and masturbate in the bathroom at work
Mm. 8 rated by tolerance for kinks and general desensitization. I'm not going to be shocked by most things even if I'm not into it.
4 by interest in most of them. I'd go along with most things up to mild S&M but a lot of more "extreme" stuff (to my scale) plays with degradation to one degree or another and that's a boner killer.
i want my bed to have robotic tentacles
My perversion level is 69.
Nice.
Nice.
4 + 2i
You're like that kinky statistician, you need more than standard deviancy.
10 tbh. No pedophile shit but some things that would probably make some friends break ties with me. My close friends would understand but the ones who I've drifted away from over time who are more towards the conservative side of things (NOT conservatives though) would probably just peace out. More public facing, probably a 7 or 8? Let's go with 8. Into BDSM and a big sub, watersports, impact play, bondage, etc. Petplay, kind of, I'd love to be someone's pet but animal roleplay isn't something I'm comfortable with. I'm a huge anal enjoyer and a size queen but I've only toyed, never been fucked. Some friends are comfortable with it and I can talk about it casually with them, others aren't so I don't bring it up around them. So yeah, in terms of the bell curve, I'm waaaaaay off to the right in sexual weirdness. Took me a long time to get comfortable with it to the extent I can talk about it like this, and now I'm a chronic oversharer. If you want to know about the 10, you can dm me, it's just not something I want available to anyone scrolling through my post history.
I feel like I'm on par with pixeltree.
Also not comfortable with sharing ALL the details, but aside from pain, which brings me no joy, there isn't much I wouldn't at least try once.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Probably about a 5. The monsterfucker fantasy rears its ugly head sure, but unless scientists make hot bara werewolves real and aliens roll up and are dtf, I'm fairly vanilla in practice.
Fantasy, I think I'm kinky, but I've been a denizen of the internet for too long and seen far too much efukt to believe I'm extremely kinky. Still, watersports and buttstuff make up the majority of the porn I consume. So a 6-7?
But, I have only ever been in vanilla relationships, so what do I know. Username relevent.
I have no idea where I'm at, because the difference between a 9 and a 7, or a 4 and a 7, doesn't really get into my mind much. I think some of my kinks would get me banned from places, but they're mostly fantasy. They would never happen in real life. So does that make me a 10, or am I only a 5 because I set hard limits and know I don't want those things, only to imagine them?
...now, that being said, if there was some way to experience something and recover (so no permanent injuries, physical OR mental), I'd try just about everything. I know I wouldn't like everything, but I'd try it just to say I had.
Anyway, peg me about a 7. Between the occasional furry fling (and all the craziness drawn art can get up to, whoah), deepthroating 13" dildos, and my libido, I'd say I'm pretty perverted.
- I've done and enjoyed stuff I think most people haven't, and a slap is still faster than a kiss and none of my fantasies are about plain sex, but I enjoy plain sex every day, and counting down I think that:
10 is people who want something that will kill them or someone else.
9 is people who want something that would land them in jail, or literal fetishists who get off on something that doesn't include what most of us think of as sex, and only that.
8 is people who need something other than plain sex or can enjoy things that most of us find too gross
7 is people who identify mostly as their kink but can enjoy sex without it
Which would leave me at 6. I think way more people are in the 1-5 group than the 6-10 group, it's not an even distribution. If you are asking where I'd land in the general population of women, that would probably be a different answer.
::: spoiler I see a spectrum of minds; not the toys, genders, or fixations. I also see a nearly inescapable addiction that must be managed by everyone. When I ask myself "why this or that kink," it is the spectrum of motivations and mind of the underlying individual that really determines where the person lies in some sense of extremities of measure against other humans. I find people's sense of self awareness in this space as interesting; their self perception at something that is ultimately nothing more than health and addiction management in the human condition.
I rate myself a 7 because I know there are limits to my self awareness like blind spots in complex ways along with most of the areas where I must be careful. Like my size and strength do not always match the person I am inside. I can both intimidate and cause harm if I am not careful. Someone that asks to go hard might get a bit more than they bargained for. It's not really my thing, but exploring the full scope of their thing is, and therein lies the potential problem.
In my opinion, far more people are 7-10 even when they are ultra conservative and vanilla in their exploration of sexuality. The evidence is in those that have records of harm, and had unexpected encounters that lead to a series of very poor decisions. To me, these are the most dangerous individuals with the most extreme perversions. Those that know themselves and enjoy a thrill, are completely normal, harmless, and of absolutely no concern to me. This does not mean that I directly correlate a scale of perversion with a general potential for harm. I view the the individual's self awareness and intent as the critical dimensions. Only they can truly know these aspects of themselves. I can infer much, but it takes time. So for the most part I simply lack the relevant data to make judgements about anyone. People with self proclaimed extreme interests, are like athletes in extreme sports. I see the real extremes as those that lack self awareness or those that have never matured to a point of developing their own internal sense of ethics outside of social constructs like religion. These are like obese people that are unhealthy and the real potential danger.
So you would put more people as kinky because you think most are repressing very dark shit? Maybe, but seems like most people I know kind of don't care that much about sex, if that makes sense. If it's more like violence that just sometimes finds a sexual outlet, is that even kinky?
The 1-5 I'd put as:
1 is asexual, do not even feel desire at all.
2 the demisexual who can kinda enjoy it if you do but really are just doing it for someone else they wouldn't bother for themselves.
3 the people who have to be in love to feel sexual desire, they can be 'unlocked', basically, it's just part of love to them. May actually do more variety of stuff but only for someone else, really do not feel independent sexual desire but love and sex entwined.
4 I think of as the normal people who can enjoy sex as an activity, outside of a relationship just for physical pleasure but it doesn't pull at them so hard, and they don't want unusual stuff just sex. Probably don't seek out sex specifically, but dates,
5 the normal people who are more adventurous, and who get frustrated sooner, have a more active sex drive and will seek out sex partners, will go outside their comfort zone if a partner suggests it. Sexually active normal people I don't think of as kinky.
I just think probably a very large chunk of people just don't prioritize sex or need anything very specific.
So you would put more people as kinky because you think most are repressing very dark shit? Maybe, but seems like most people I know kind of don’t care that much about sex, if that makes sense. If it’s more like violence that just sometimes finds a sexual outlet, is that even kinky?
Everyone has the same basic hormonal needs as humans. Every human must balance these needs on some level. This is the lowest foundational level of everything I see and understand about sexuality. All forms of sexual expression are roads on a map that lead back to here. Therefore, everyone is traveling on this road map. Some people may be on Obvious Kinky Street or Furry Lane, but everyone is on one of these paths, even if it is on some super secret side street out of view, and one they walk in circles on for their entire lives. The amount of travel and exploration vary greatly, but it is all within the spectrum of the roads and connections on this map. Dark shit happens because of mental health issues, but also because we heavily stigmatize many connections present on this map or straight up deny that some roads exist. Basically, kinks are one manifestation of sexual intelligence and self awareness.
I think most people are kinky because the roads are connections and are fundamentally present. They are on the map even when they do not know about it or acknowledge it. It is very easy for such persons to get unexpectedly lost in places they are not familiar. They tend to travel the wrong way on one way streets or step into some innocent person on their own path. Some asshats plow through an intersection in a school zone with a kid in the crosswalk.
As an example, if a person really likes dominance for arousal, they should be playing in BDSM with like minded consenting participants, not encountering someone on a lonely street at night and taking advantage of an opportunity.
I view the fundamental factor in common as a dominance kink and the person that openly acknowledges and explores this kink as sexually intelligent. However the fundamental kink of power dynamics is a core part of some functional thought and a type of person. The extent of the trait varies, but it is a part of all people with this type of functional thought. The spectrum of my "7-10" is a measure of self awareness and the intention is largely their degree of proclivity. If the person is suppressing a large proclivity and finds themselves getting lost on the wrong road, I view them as extreme in their kinks even if they appear asexual on the surface to others. They lack self awareness and familiarity with the map and are like a wrecking ball in a China shop. In a prudish society, there are a lot of these wrecking balls that are bottled and suppressed; far more than those with psychosis as active predators.
Oh, so more like you are asking how actualized are your kinks? I think that is a good question. I spent a stupid long time waiting for my sexuality to evolve and turn into what I considered the 'real' adult woman sexuality, which involved getting off on taking charge. Like, even though my very earliest sexual fantasies were about being forced (not even sexually, necessarily) and never about anything except that power play stuff, I really truly thought I ought not want it, that it was some sort of unfinished or lazy thing. One day had a revelation that if any of my friends had some kink I'd be so accepting of them, never ever would I think they needed to change, so tried to give myself the same consideration, and am much more in alignment now. So in the scale of acceptance, maybe 8 or so. But I do not agree that everyone 'vanilla' is repressing hidden depths of perversity. I think many, probably most people really aren't. Even those with a healthy sex drive. And no way does everyone have the same levels of general need, it took me 40 years to find a guy who runs as hot as me, get it every day now for about 15 years :)
Oh, so more like you are asking how actualized are your kinks?
More like, are kinks a facet of functional thought. I think they are. The way an AI models roleplays also defaults to this pattern.
People seriously get bent out of shape over this, but I can't get past the idea that so many people among the elite went to Epstein's island. I support the cultural taboo against kids and pedophilia BTW. The fact that Epstein was a thing says a whole lot about society, human nature, and the real underlying statistics. Everything I look at seems to point to certain personalities having specific proclivities in common.
We are still products of our environment, so people that have social pressures pushing them into self suppression can be volatile.
I can turn my sex drive on and off a will, but off only lasts a few weeks to a month. Otherwise daily service needed at a minimum.
Of course, like most things, my real world kink is meta; exploring my partner's kinks and experience. It has been a very long time since I've been able to practice but whatever. It was never about me in the first place, so I mind less about being alone now. I would likely hurt myself anyways because chronic damage to the thoracic spine is weird. I know I would likely try too hard and push my physicality too far. I'm so much more self aware than I was in my late twenties. It would be fun to explore what level of nuance I am capable of perceiving and responding to. I can become anyone or play any role when required, if I am given the time to mull over the role.
I can be mildly amused by things like power dynamics, but my empathy is always on the edge of concerned. I probably like breaking the rules themes most just because it harkens back to my highschool days. These are elements that can get my attention, or make me smile, but are not like an effective call to action. A lover saying she wants to explore, or just play my little games of teasing, thrilling, and applying every bit of my attention to her on every level I can attend to, that is my biggest call to action. I want to play and make someone feel a little better than last time in a tangible way. It is like playing an instrument. I'm looking for my magnum opus in every attempt. I can be chill, or quick if needed. I'll add some flair, but my favorite is to attempt to play every instrument in the symphony all at the same time with music in the style to suit the listener. I both have no kinks, and have all the kinks at the same time... Quantum cat sex...I guess that is my style... Schrödy kink? Gives a new facet to getting physical.
probably a 9. I have been timed out for my fantasies once so far
Username checks out
"it goes up to eleven"
My goals are beyond your understanding.
Maybe a 3+.
While I'm completely satisfied by vanilla sex with my partner every time, I'm not locked into my personal interests or against the wider spectrum. 3 is where I want it, anything else is just extra credit.
load more comments
(3 replies)
0 - ain't had any (this year at least)
10, if that's as high as it goes. I'm judging 'perversion' to be a combination of 'conceptual distance from normative sex' and 'the degree to which the average person would be horrified by it.' I don't get banned from places because I'm not a jerk, but there aren't any 'communities' for what I'm into anyway. I don't think my thing even has a name, really. For that matter, it might not actually fit on a scale like this where the assumption seems to be 'sex plus some stuff.' My therapist thinks I should write a book about it.
It's kind of lonely, and it's a pain in the ass to find porn (I usually have to just make my own) but I did get lucky in that none of it involves kids or animals or anyone incapable of consent.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
48 points (81.6% liked)
No Stupid Questions
35393 readers
2081 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS