46
submitted 1 week ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world

Could it be? Is Astro Bot really going to be the thing that makes Sony revisit older franchises?

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Vipsu@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Some of these could use "Nightdive" treatment like TimeSplitters trilogy.

Simple a PC version of the game with support for latest hardware and operating systems and support for LAN or self hostable multiplayer would give these games new life among people not interested in modern multiplayer games.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

no shit. a basic graphics overhaul and add mp features would bring in so much money and many fans. the fans of the og consoles are older and have money now, we yearn for simpler times and not being tethered to drm single player games and shitty cash grabs.

shit, id buy a remaster Mario 64 or GoldenEye in a heartbeat.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Best Nintendo can offer you is renting them in perpetuity with no enhancements.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I know 😢

[-] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Bring back Intelligent Qube. I still have the PS demo disc.

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

It was called Kurushi here in our neck of the woods; and I’m glad I’m not the only person who still intensely remembers that game from a demo disc.

I ended up picking up a mint copy to add to my collection; well worth it IMO.

[-] Yokozuna@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

And at the same time, I'm slowly collecting copies of all the old games I used to play, and some I didn't play as a kid. I just picked up a damn near pristine copy of Gundam Battle Assault 2 for $40. The game basically never fluctuated in value in about 20 years time and I find that hilarious.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago
[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

it doesn't matter what these corporations 'think', anything they remake or whatever the hot term is, they will turn it into some trash with a store. That's NOT why people are seeking games from an era where this cancer didn't exist.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I don't think that's what's happening here, unless you're expanding your definition to be that you're renting this legacy library with a subscription.

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

Fans enjoy older titles however they want to

Companies get pissy because fans are having fun and not paying again or constantly via subscriptions

Company 'remakes' game to justify IP, does piss poor job, changes things that never needed to be changed and adds in-game store or subscription model because 'new market conditions' and 'inset other buzz words'

Gamers detest all changes and move onto the next old school gem.

That's the life cycle of remakes..

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

But that's not the cycle chronicled in this article. These are old games released onto subscription services in their original versions, more or less, give or take some resolution.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
46 points (88.3% liked)

Games

31922 readers
2405 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS