this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
82 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
12 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ledditors griefing over internet "censorship" and muh freeze peach principles that were apparently violated when effective, direct measures were used to combat fascism.

I don’t think we should ever celebrate people being deplatformed...If the content is illegal pursue legal means to punish the posters...But let’s say they win, and they get the domain blocked everywhere. They’ll just launch a new domain, just like all the pirate streaming sites do.

Are you implying you shouldn't try to do anything because the fascists will (deterministically) win? Hence why the people trying to shut them down went straight to the ISPs because they know they can win the ISPs over on moral grounds?

[...] you have to decide if the internet is a human right or not. If it is, it must be for everyone, or it is for no one. As soon as we make exceptions to basic rights, those rights get eroded for everyone. Because people in power will bend the exceptions to political expediency.

Fascists don't deserve basic rights.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 year ago (5 children)

[…] you have to decide if the internet is a human right or not. If it is, it must be for everyone, or it is for no one.

It's a human right.

Fascists aren't human.

😘

[–] DayOfDoom@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not getting harassed by internet fascists should be a human right too, but the only 'rights' they care about are the ones that expand their bourgeois consumerism.

[–] lckdscl@whiskers.bim.boats 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Chuds when people are doxxed, stalked, and sent death threats

shrug-outta-hecks

Chuds when they can't reply "peepeepoopoo" to their president on the internet

rage-cry

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

it must be for everyone, or it is for no one

The nazis must be let into the restaurant, or else no one should ever be seated galaxy-brain

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can still... use the rest of the internet... after the site is taken down...?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately.

[–] ExternalAlpaca@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

most based lemmy.ml poster

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fascists don't deserve basic rights.

correct

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More and more people are saying this! But seriously, in the gulag you'll get human rights but certainly not a loaded machine gun like unrestricted internet access to stalk, bully, and harass people to self-harm.

[–] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but certainly not a loaded machine gun

oh, they'll get a loaded machine gun
just not the end of it they're expecting

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

Fascists deserve as many human rights as they believe others should have

So yes. None 😊

[–] uralsolo@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These people don't understand how rights work - or rather, they have the intentionally stunted understanding of rights fed to them by American political theory.

KF's right to exist as a website conflicts with many other peoples' right not to be stalked, harassed, etc. If, let's say, you went to public park and catcalled every woman there, the state would be right to kick you out and ban you from the park. Same principle.

KF as an institution was literally created for the purpose harassing someone. This is before getting into how they're fash and shit like that - even under liberal rules of engagement they should have been shut down a long time ago.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Legality is a very stupid and bad metric for what sites and communities should be combated. Piracy is illegal, fascism is legal. Laws are threats from the dominant socioeconomic group and so on.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Also, who's version of legality? I very much doubt Mr "Let the law handle the Nazis" is going to be happy if Iran or Saudi Arabia tried to take down porn sites due to their local laws.

Of course, that's a rhetorical question. Whenever someone talks like this they always mean American/Western laws, which they assume should apply universally.

[–] Finger@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago
[–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why do orgs like the EFF and ACLU value moral victory over material victory?

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago

Because moral victory is good for the bourgeois state, while material victory is not

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

They're libs

[–] Balefirex@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalist ideology in general, Žižek maintains, consists precisely in the overvaluing of belief – in the sense of inner subjective attitude – at the expense of the beliefs we exhibit and externalize in our behavior. So long as we believe (in our hearts) that capitalism is bad, we are free to continue to participate in capitalist exchange.

  • Capitalist Realism chapter 2
[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

I see that a lot with China Man Bad takes, they decry the evil of the CPC, pick one random Chinese corporation they swear off (Tencent is a popular one), and then act like they’ve taken a principled stand while continuing to buy mountains of plastic shit that’s made in China.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Because moral victories don't cost as much to the ruling class. stonks-up

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

They are part of the non-profit industrial complex. They make money by appealing to hardship and selling gains, not by directly assaulting systems of oppression. If they did, they would be quickly outlawed, perhaps branded a terrorist organization. They also ensure their own power and relevance through integration with that oppressive system and its centers of power. The EFF makes most of its money from "charitable organizations", i.e. rich people's kids' orgs that function as cheap PR due to tax write-offs, i.e. mouthpieces of the bourgeoisie. The ACLU is a libertarian org in bed with all kinds of corporate goons, again via "charitable organizations". It's actually a pretty great example of the limits of reformism and the way that radical movements are coopted into snd subsumed by capital, as it began as something much cooler.

[–] forcequit@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’ll just launch a new domain, just like all the pirate streaming sites do.

copyrighted material and documenting people's whereabouts and goings on are exactly the same thing actually

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

context don't real, everything is a frictionless, spherical concept in a vacuum

[–] forcequit@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and that's why I cyberstalk kids

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Freedom of speech (and comparable rights) applies under the assumption that no concerns should go unheard to ensure that everyone's needs are considered when making decisions so the best outcome can be achieved for everyone.

Kiwifarms exists to hurt people. People use it to hurt others. It does not need defending.

[–] FortifiedAttack@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

The thing about Kiwifarms is that it acts a lot more like Reddit (as a whole) than your typical forum. People don't come to Kiwifarms because they want to be a part of the Kiwifarms community -- they come to Kiwifarms because they obsess about some individual or some other community that they want to dunk on or harass. Each thread therefore has to be viewed more akin to a subreddit with its own separate userbase than your typical forum thread.

The best example for this are their two competing Ukraine war threads, one pro-Russia, the other pro-Ukraine, each with roughly the same number of posts yet representing two completely different, irreconcilable worldviews.

This property is what I think makes Kiwifarms so extremely resilient. Even if they have to move to the darknet, where other sites would normally not survive, they still have the necessary draw to gain new users from mere name recognition alone.

Because when you're obsessed about something or someone, is the small hurdle of installing torbrowser and looking up an onion link really going to stop you?

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Turns out the "natural rights" framework is liberal bullshit and legal rights, while extremely useful, must be embraced as a fallible human construction that, on some level of application, must be delineated arbitrarily.

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

Nonsense built upon stilts

load more comments (1 replies)

I don’t think we should ever celebrate people being deplatformed

Correct. We should debate them in the marketplace of ideas

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So Keffals didn't get kiwifarms shutdown after all, huh?

[–] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it was down for like a week at best

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

Sucks, wish I went down permanently.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

The endless battle to banish the world's most notorious stalker site - Lemmy.world

Damn Lemmy, I didn't know you guys were into stalking. But... uhhh... use those powers for good, I guess?

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

Not sure why they're involved, but uncritical support to the Economic Freedom Fighters against the internet fascists rat-salute

[–] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

as long as the US government wouldn't literally put someone in a cage for it, you are morally obligated to provide anyone who asks with the means to do whatever they want, with zero discretion allowed on your part. because it's speech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] M68040@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago

I hate KF and the userbase more than virtually anything else. Pig farm septic bog ass site.

load more comments
view more: next ›