378
submitted 1 week ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency appeal from Nevada’s Green Party seeking to include presidential candidate Jill Stein on the ballot in the battleground state.

The court’s order Friday, without any noted dissents, allows ballot preparation and printing to proceed in Nevada without Stein and other Green Party candidates included.

The outcome is a victory for Democrats who had challenged the Greens’ inclusion on the ballot in a state with a history of extremely close statewide races. In 2020, President Joe Biden outpaced former President Donald Trump by fewer than 35,000 votes in the state.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 107 points 1 week ago

Same time next Presidential election, Jill?

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 51 points 1 week ago

I mean she could use the time between to build local support for the Green Party in lots of places. I guess that isn't what she's after.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

And God forbid they spend any money on local elections where they can affect things like I don't know actual green party issues.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 13 points 1 week ago

Sure usually hangs out in Russia between elections, right?

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The Winter Candidate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

More's the pity, she can't run for president of Russia either.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

while normally I'd be upset if they were running somebody with some kind of real intent to push real issues, its clear Stein is mostly isnt interested in pushing anything but conspiracy theories and russian appeasement.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

But if we don't vote 3rd party then democrats will never do the exact things I want, or some shit

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

Oh dear, that’s going to make her path to an electoral college victory harder, isn’t it.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 25 points 1 week ago

She has 49 other states she can fail to win in...

but still siphon enough votes to hand trump the whitehouse

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

270 to win!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

Why can’t these candidates file proper forms? What the hell is so difficult about that?

[-] tal@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago

There are a miniscule number of presidential candidates running in a given year, so I assume that the UX on the process isn't very optimized.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

but she's done this like 3 times already.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

The petition forms were faulty. Be nice if we were told what was wrong with them

load more comments (45 replies)
[-] finickydesert@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

Again.... I might just go back too being a Dem. I tried 3rd party but, this stuff keeps happing. I like the ideals just no was too do it from a third party way for the time being. Gotta change from with in I guess.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

Not from within, from underneath. You effect change at the lower levels. Political change comes from the ground up. That's why Jill Stein is so frustrating cuz she takes all the money and attention that could be spent somewhere useful and instead spends it on a boondoggle for her own personal gain.

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago

This. The Brits have a first past the post system. Greens now are winning mayorships and parliament seats and making deals with labor not to split the vote in their favor because they have been building local support for decades.

They are a force in their districts, so they get elected to office in their districts. Do that to a few dozen districts and you can meaningfully affect the balance of power in Westminster. Then you start getting into coalitions and supplying ministers.

You can’t just wake up once every four years and hope to be anything but a spoiler candidate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ravhall 10 points 1 week ago

The two party system is incredibly frustrating. There is also a feeling of helplessness because the path to change is unclear. Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans truly want more competition

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

She seemed like a good alternative to Trump and Clinton at the time. But looking back I realize she was just put there by Putin to draw away lesser evil votes from Clinton so Trump could win. Another reason the Democratic Party fucked up by not allowing centrist or leftist candidates like Sanders even when they'd have a way better chance of winning by getting a lot of people to actually vote because they'd have a candidate they like rather than just voting against the other guy.

load more comments (2 replies)

Putin is gonna be so pissed at her

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

More good news on a Friday.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I kind of wish ap would include things like this:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/092024zr_h3cj.pdf

In this case it's almost nothing, but sometimes it's nice to have for the longer documents. I'd also like a link to the original decision they were appealing.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
378 points (96.6% liked)

News

23024 readers
4202 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS