this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
562 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

31975 readers
579 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 184 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And I guarantee that billionaire Larry Ellison blithely believes that he'll be exempt - that all of this surveillance will just be used against the little people. And he's almost certainly right.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He will be exempt. The areas that he lives in and the things that he does will not be tagged as "criminal" on the data system that he has the contract to administer.

That's always how these systems work. You don't worry about getting dragged into the Saudi Consulate and bonesawed to death by intelligence officers when you're MBS, because you're the boss and the guy getting bonesawed is your employee.

For the same reason, you don't worry about getting spied on when you're the one who owns and operates the big surveillance infrastructure because it exists for your benefit.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Just look at Musk to see someone whose wealth entirely excuses his behavior. It ain’t hypothetical in the slightest.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 103 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Owner of Cloud company that sells AI services tells governments that AI-powered surveillance is good.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

governments and surveillance, name a more iconic pair

[–] smallpatatas@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Corporations and surveillance?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 98 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable. So did the divine right of kings. Any human power can be resisted and changed by human beings. - Ursula K Le Guin

[–] ninjaphysics@beehaw.org 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 months ago

Pass it on...

[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He’s voicing what every billionaire and government official already thinks. Call me pessimist but I believe it’s unavoidable. VPNs are seen as “tools to overcome government bans to access illegal websites” in so many countries, hence getting banned. Access to mainstream websites also getting harder and harder when on VPN. People hosting Tor exit nodes are living in fear of police raids.

Even with some little amount of privacy protecting measures, websites start to act strangely or do not work, and the amount of websites like this increases every day. As protecting our privacy becomes a bigger and bigger effort, more people will give up, strengthening the arguments against it. Eventually we’ll hit big brother levels.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Eventually we’ll hit big brother levels.

As someone who was born before the age of surveillance capitalism, I can tell you we've hit that level a long time ago. Anybody who thinks society has been running normally for at least the past 15 years is too young to have known what a normal society is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExtravagantEnzyme@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I2P could be a solid option over TOR then, no?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe billionaires should be filmed and streamed continuously, since their behavior has such a big impact on the world. If they don't like it maybe we shouldn't allow them to control such incredible assets. I'm sure billionaires have nothing sketchy to hide, right? What we will see is probably how they are hard working people who are not at all detached from normal folks. Right?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 20 points 1 month ago

Wrong think detected, proper authority has been notified.

Resitence iis futile.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

Fuck you Larry.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

By "citizens" he means poor people, naturally, and by "best behaviour" he means obedience to authority.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

And by authority he means himself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The first XKCD that comes to mind

Ellision sounds like the kind of guy that wants an unstoppable army of robot swarms.

Representative Jamie Raskin recently brought up the term neo-monarchy.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So the Panopticon. The hypothetical prison that even people in the 1800s thought would be a human rights violation to build because it was such an extreme form of psychological torture.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Well, we already experience that psychological torture. After 2002/2003, and then especially after 2012, this concept has already burdened our everyday behavior. Browsing behavior, phone calls, texts, emails…every single way we communicate, even face to face meetings with phones in our pockets are open to surveillance. And it’s been shown that it’s been used. Over a decade ago, thanks to Snowden. Now? Things have surely gotten worse and I would bet the farm on behavior very much having changed due these facts.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

“Citizens” 🙄 Not every person is a citizen; I’ve got a pet peeve about this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I have been hating this man's guts since the mid 90's and somehow it never lets off. Most hateful people manage to become a little bit more likeable as they age. Even this disgusting piece of human refuse Bill Gates might pass for a somewhat okay human being if you wilfully overlook why he truly does philanthropy.

But Larry Ellison? Hell no. He never changes. he's just consistently the worst year after year, decade after decade.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lmg, he'll be exempt from this surveillance along with all his rich ass-hole buddies

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Subjugating the working class majority is literally the whole point of establishing a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This dude can shove that stupid boat up his ass

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

billionaires who talk like this should immediately be committed. he's clearly far gone, just fucking take him away.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

But they're will be no cameras in his torture dungeon, of course.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

My best behavior is to be on Larry Ellison's front yard with pitchforks burning torches and guillotines.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

what he really means is he can make a ton of money out of it

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What he really means is the rich can prevent uprisings against them before they have a chance to start.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

Dude is crying for a guillotine. Someone tell this asshole movies aren't real life events. lmao

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

"[Stupid rich person shit]"

--Larry Ellison, soon to be major shareholder of Paramount

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

Private jets . They’ve all got multiple front yards & none of us can afford pitchforks But small aeroplanes, those are weak. & these parasites just looove em

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 14 points 2 months ago

Thank you all for these comments, they have made another horrible piece of news a bit less horrible (by knowing people are apaled by this shit).

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Who defines what best behavior is?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, Larry obviously.

Coincidentally, Larry will not be under surveillance.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Ay they took capitalism so far it wrapped around into orwellian territory.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 18 points 2 months ago

1984 was written in 1948, after fascists had already demonstrated that capitalism is quite compatible with totalitarianism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chromolium_falcon@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

in bad country the ruling class uses AI scoring system to ensure the compliance of the workers

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So glad we live in good country where the ruling class are benevolent and would never do that to us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those are not citizens. This is not a democracy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You need to pretend you live in a democracy or the administrators will take away the illusion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rooskie91 12 points 2 months ago

And a fueled bottle can keep billionaires in check.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 2 months ago

Was he on that island discussing whether the billionaires could keep their security detail loyal with shock collars?

Ellison is the world's sixth-richest man with a net worth of $157 billion, according to Bloomberg.

They are really concerned when people tire of their children dying from hunger and easily treatable diseases, we'll be coming for them. But rather than give up an iota of the money generations can never spend for our ecology and things people need to live, they resort to things like shock collars and surveillance states.

[–] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 10 points 2 months ago

In other words, lack of accountability leads to bad behaviour. He might be onto something there…

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"We're going to have supervision," Ellison said. "Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times, and if there's a problem, AI will report that problem and report it to the appropriate person. Citizens will be on their best behavior because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that's going on."

And if we entertained the idea that this was true and the core focus of this idea (it's not) what do we think the chances are that the "appropriate person" will be one of two things:

  1. Another cop

  2. A subscription service digital surveillance company with that cop as a client that they report back to for "internal investigation", as long as the bill is paid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kbal@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago

Larry "privacy is dead, get over it" Ellison.

load more comments
view more: next ›