-106

Meta CEO admits Biden-Harris admin pressured company to censor Americans (www.foxbusiness.com)

submitted 1 month ago by realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club to c/news@lemmy.world

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

In Monday’s letter, Zuckerberg also wrote about throttling the Hunter Biden laptop story.

He wrote that the FBI warned his company about "a potential Russian disinformation operation" regarding the Biden family and Burisma, leading up to the 2020 election.

Trump's WH in fall 2020....

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Fox Business? The network that aired unapologetic bigot Lou Dobbs' show every single night for years?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Fuck this

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, these hypocritical dipshits are the first to cheer on Palestinians getting deplatformed and harassed, and they want me to give a shit that they were occasionally prevented from spreading misinformation about medical realities in the middle of a pandemic? A middle finger the size of the sun isn't big enough for these assholes.

[+] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club -34 points 1 month ago

I mean...nothing in the article is false, right?

[-] g0nz0li0@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

There's nothing in the article but Meta PR! It's not factual reporting, and Fox has done nothing to corroborate the claims and provide actual analysis.

Zuckerberg is vague about what he was asked to "censor" (humour and satire?) but also makes clear that Facebook rebuffed officials and all that happened was that those officials expressed frustration. What's the actual allegation here? Zuck got hurt feelings?

Zuck refers to Facebook's mission as "helping people connect in a safe and secure way" to try and downplay the Cambridge Analytics scandal the fact that they're are an ad platform first and foremost. This is Meta prop.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

If I said foxbusiness was an outpost of global propaganda founded by an alien it wouldn’t be false. Just peculiarly worded to imply something else.

[+] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club -15 points 1 month ago

If I posted a link to an article saying the same thing, but from a different news organization, would you believe it?

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/27/business/mark-zuckerberg-meta-biden-censor-covid-2021/index.html

Bad news organizations tell the truth sometimes, and good ones lie sometimes.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Can you identify the differences between the two? or just do the URL, then the headline. Why is one better, or more preferable, than the other?

[+] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club -15 points 1 month ago

There are some differences here for sure, but I'm not sure if they would warrant claiming that one is dramatically better than the other.

CNN: The article claims that Mark stated that he bowed to government pressure to censor COVID-19 misinformation and comedic content like memes, refers to Biden publicly decrying such content in 2021, and then points out that he walked back those comments later, although the surgeon general continued to condemn COVID-19 misinformation. It also mentions that Zuckerberg was asked by the FBI about the possibility that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation. It insinuates that this is why FaceBook censored the story when it was published by the New York Post. It notes that Zuckerberg recognizes now that the story is true, and wishes that he didn't censor the story at the time. While his goal regarding the COVID-19 misinformation censorship was to help local governments make sure people were getting accurate information, he states that he won't cooperate with such requests in the future. It wraps up pointing out that Republicans has celebrated this admission, as these actions are something they have criticized Zuckerberg for for years, and he testified on Capitol Hill in part to allay the fears of such lawmakers.

Fox Business: The article claims that Mark stated that he bowed to government pressure to censor COVID-19 misinformation and comedic content like memes, and mentions that he has been cooperative with previous congressional requests for documents and employee interviews related to such requests. It states that at the time, they did not want to censor the content, but ultimately decided to do so after hearing vocal frustration from the Biden administration regarding it. He regrets the decision to censor past content at the behest of the US government, and is pledging not to do so moving forward. It also mentions that a White House spokesperson heavily insinuated to Fox News that they encouraged FaceBook to censor certain types of content, based on how such content would affect the populace. It mentions that FaceBook was subpoenaed regarding such censorship, as well as that Mark also admitted to censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story after being told by the FBI that it could be Russian disinformation, keeping the story censored while it fact-checked the story for themselves. He now admits that the story was true, and regrets censoring the story at the time, pledging to no longer censor stories in this manner moving forward.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

The reporting doesn’t seem remarkably different, so let’s look at the part most people see. Only The Headline.

Meta CEO admits Biden-Harris admin pressured company to censor Americans

vs.

Mark Zuckerberg says Meta was ‘pressured’ by Biden administration to censor Covid-related content in 2021

I can see three things immediately that mark one as much-less-preferable than the other. I assume you can too?

Meta CEO ADMITS Biden-Harris admin pressured company to CENSOR AMERICANS

It’s written that way for a specific reason, and it’s not a Good Reason.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Facebook is about to go down in a flaming pile of dogshit. Just like twitter.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Oldie but a goodie.

They also labeled themselves as "entertainment" and not news to wiggle out of a couple lawsuits, and one of their lawyers argued in front of a judge that no sane person would believe their programs to get out of another lawsuit.

[-] Rottcodd@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It amuses the hell out of me every time the conservatives whine about their brazen disinformation getting censored, since whenenver and wherever they get an opportunity (including, especially ironically, Facebook), they reveal themselves to be the most cowardly censorious people on the planet.

Everywhere, without exception, where conservatives have control, anything that even hints at undermining their comforting delusions is instantly censored.

But if anybody dares to censor anything they might want to say, including overt and deliberate lies, they wail and cry like the spoiled children they are.

[+] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club -19 points 1 month ago

I'm in a right wing Lemmy community run by someone who used to be alt right (and probably is but I muted him when he was spouting racist nonsense at me on another corner of the Fediverse), conservative@lemm.ee, and there is absolutely zero censorship over there. Most of the comments there are by people on the left.

I get what you're saying here to a point, there are a lot of right wingers who support censorship to varying degrees. Even Trump has spoken in support of some forms of censorship before, even if they didn't materialize into political policy ("opening up the libel laws" and his recent calls to make burning the American flag a crime come to mind). But it's not true that every single conservative supports anti-left censorship, without exception.

[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Dude, conservatives are literally ~~burning~~ banning books everywhere in the country where they have power. They've even banned books meant to encourage girls to learn how to code. Real bananas stuff, imo

I appreciate you're trying to communicate well and you seem authentic and all, but it's very difficult to take your position seriously when it feels like you're not trying to challenge your own beliefs. There's a ton of evidence of conservative censorship going as far back as McCarthyism and interment camps, to rock and roll and rap music, to even burning comic books in the 50s, and that's just thinking of the US. There's a very long history of white conservative Christians censoring almost everything popular going back like hundreds of years

As a personal anecdote, my cousin had to break his pokemon gameboy games and burn his pokemon cards because his ~~dipshit mom~~ abusive mother thought they were satanic, simply because her church said so. I got some cool, holographic cards out of it, but I never forgot how messed up that was

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 7 points 1 month ago

there is absolutely zero censorship over there

Challenge accepted

I’ll be back with you tonight or tomorrow

[-] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club -4 points 1 month ago

LMK how it goes!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

and there is absolutely zero censorship over there.

The modlog says otherwise.

https://lemm.ee/modlog/387489

You do know about the modlog, yes?

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah Zuck, where were we without the Covid humor with thousands dying?

[-] Kidding_me@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Not like all the Trump GOP misinformation posts had anything to do with it

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Uh good? Social media should be censored pretty fucking frequently. I honestly feel like if Facebook just disallowed any discussion or advertising for anything political on their platform the electorate would be more informed.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Fox Business - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Fox Business:

MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/meta-ceo-admits-biden-harris-admin-pressured-company-censor-americans

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024

-106 points (7.3% liked)

News

23024 readers

4580 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world