this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
138 points (97.9% liked)

Space

8736 readers
249 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

8-day mission, in and out, quick test guys.

[–] FreeLikeGNU@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Hahaha nice!

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

β€œThere was just too much uncertainty in the prediction of the thrusters,” [Commercial Crew Program manager Steve] Stich said. β€œIf we had a model, [if] we had a way to accurately predict what the thrusters would do for the undock and all the way through the de-orbit burn, through the separation sequence, I think we would have taken a different course of action.”

I think that’s the crucial issue. I feel good that the NASA officials were unanimous on this decision.

[–] wirehead@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Engineering leaders have to work as bullshit detectors. People aren't even necessarily trying to lie, they just built up an unconscious tower of their own ego and it's hard to step back far enough to get them to realize that maybe the surefire solution they are emotionally invested in that's theirs is actually super-sketch. Presumably there's a bunch of people on the Boeing team working thrusters who were totally convinced that they understood it well enough, the simulations all showed it was fine, etc.

But you can't, as a leader, inspect everything in deep detail. So you have to have a shortcut, which is you detect bullshit.

Boeing triggered the bullshit detector. (Or, depending on how you see things, "Boeing finally triggered the bullshit detector") And once you've triggered the bullshit detector, now everything's going to be checked for bullshit.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Ah, yes, the BSD.

You would think, after Challenger and Columbia, that NASA would have a lower threshold for these things as well.

[–] FreeLikeGNU@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I wonder if their flight home after return to earth will involve a Boeing aircraft?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

But will they get their carry-on bag fee refunded?

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 2 points 2 months ago

The thing I read was there were cross-supplier compadability with the space suits. Is that true? How was there an oversight on not having a standard space suits?