It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
The most civil thing to do is to introduce him to baseball
I want to civilly hit him in the face with a brick. Dumb shithead set back my mission to kill god by years with his Islamaphobic dipshittery.
It's a simple, biological fact and reality that Richard Dawkins is meant to be hit in the face with a brick
source: same ass richard dawkins pulled his transphobic "facts" from
(undisputed)
He's evolved a brick hittable face as a defensive method against being British. It's his evolutionary niche. The selfish brick prick.
I stopped paying attention a long time ago. But I'm shocked that Richard Dawkins would have an opinion this bad. I'm also shocked that FB gives a fuck about transphobia now.
This was always going to be Richard Dawkins’ path. Over the past few years he’s really leaned into it though and now he knows where to get 
for his toast.
A few months ago Dawkins was calling himself “culturally Christian” to show that he was against the Ramadamification of Christmas in Br*tain.
It was never about atheism, science, rationality, or enlightenment values. It was about otherizing non-white (edit: and non-cis people) people in Europe and “The West.” It’s why the new atheists got popular after 9/11 and why nobody blinked when people like Sam Harris were going around calling for nuclear first strikes against “the Muslim world.”
In hindsight it's pretty obviously a movement to divorce white supremacy from anti intellectualism
So basically just English academia for the last 250 years
A few months ago Dawkins was calling himself “culturally Christian”
Hitchens was doing that over ten years ago lol
The propaganda is insane...there is ZERO proof she's got that genetic makeup. It's literally just disinformation.
(undisputed)
Richard Dawkins, fascist (undisputed)
undisputed [1]
[1] 
undisputed [1] [2]
[1]
[2] 
New Atheists not being insanely reactionary challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)
Just stick with old atheism 
Make Atheism Communist Again
Every time someone says "the 
New Atheists were right and I miss them" regarding some religious fundamentalist issue or another, I want to redirect them toward the actual New Atheists, where they stand, and demand to see where their ideological aims and their goals for society are that much different, or better.
Every time someone says "the New Atheists were right and I miss them
People say that?!?!?! I think my head would explode if i heard that
I saw it somewhere here yesterday, but I forgot where exactly.
Richard Dawkins read Imane Khalif’s genome sequencing analysis out of a hat that he swears exists and is true but none of us are allowed to see it because God would be mad about it.
Richard DawKKKin$ Mormon arc
Congrats on the site tagline!
Ngl I was happy with this one. Glad it had some legs.
Imagine having a PhD from Oxford in biology and still getting basic biology wrong.
sounds like the biology program at oxford is garbage
Best emoji on the site so far
He thinks like he gets punched in the face for a living.
It's crazy that Mike Tyson seems like a nicer person than Richard Dawkins nowadays
CW: SA
spoiler
what?
Well shit, I meant that he's less of a odious public figure than Dawkins within the last, decade maybe? I'm aware of the heinous shit Tyson did in the 90s and didn't mean to sound like I'm minimizing that
Richard Dawkins is genetically female (XX undisputed)
Genetically Neanderthal authors such as Richard Dawkins (crakkker undisputed) should not have civilized arguments with humans on Facebook.
Somehow this sounds no more stupid than what he wrote.
Lol did he just call a Facebook post a tweet
Huge "I got my son the new Nintendo 
" vibes
Counterpoint: all soda is Coke
Dawkins is such a fucking dork. At least when he was just a loud atheist, it was funny watching Christians clutch pearls but this "only 2 genders" era of him is just fucking cringe.
If he'd just shut up, he could have been the guy who coined the term "meme" and been remembered as a relatively successful minor celebrity debate-bro.
I think this a lot about of celebs that don't know how to shut up. Like, Rowling could have made Harry Potter, raked in millions and then disapppeared into obscurity instead of becoming Twitter's transphobia poster child.
been cringe since his dear muslima shit
Yeah that was some ignorant shit too.
a 
on EVERY elevatorgator!
Ummmmmmm anyone with condensed genetic organization should not participate in sports. Mmmmmmmmm science 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
Rigid species boundaries are nonsense but rigid sexual boundaries are so real!! What about the actual complexities of chromosomes?? Anything that refutes my position is a disorder and therefore doesn’t count!! Why? Because it doesn’t fit my position!!
How about richard cawkins. Fuckin owned 😎
Mfer sounds like a bird!
Fuck happened to you, Rich?