this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
117 points (98.3% liked)

Europe

1529 readers
576 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

geteilt von: https://lemmy.world/post/18147817

It's available as an official European Citizens' Initiative Proposal.

Deadline: 31/07/2025

Corresponding video by Ross

Edit: Swapped the links to direct straight to the initiative page.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] DmMacniel@feddit.org 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Damn. Finland and Sweden are speed running this.

[โ€“] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's cold up there, what else are they going to do beside gaming?

[โ€“] Bezier@suppo.fi 4 points 3 months ago

Why run your electrons through a dumb space heater when you can run them through a very convoluted rube goldberg space heater that renders polygons?

[โ€“] flyingSock@feddit.org 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Shouldn't this apply to software in general?

Unless the license specifically is for a limited amount of time, and priced accordingly, usability should be ensured. I.e. you can make sth unplayable in the future, but then you are not allowed to price it as if it was usable in perpetuity and have to include the expected usable duration in marketing materials.

[โ€“] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 months ago

It absolutely should, but focusing purely on games makes it more likely to pass, since there would be less corporate interests fighting it. It may become easier to apply this to all software at a later date if this becomes law, as it sets a precedent.

[โ€“] Poiar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nice - Something everyone can support

[โ€“] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Nintendo's definitely not gonna be happy about this.

[โ€“] BillDaCatt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I love the concept, but how would this play out? Servers cost money to operate and maintain. And publishers aren't interested in losing control of an IP or supporting them indefinitely.

So what is the goal here? Single player mode? Old school LAN partys?

[โ€“] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 months ago

Open source hostable dedicated servers, or P2P connection with an open source federated matchmaking server would be ideal imo. Just let us host the servers pls.

[โ€“] chameleon@fedia.io 12 points 3 months ago

Releasing server binaries (nobody in the context of this petition is asking for source code) is one option. Single player mode is another. Everything you'd wanna know is on https://www.stopkillinggames.com/ . Exact wording of laws and the like comes in a later phase, as with every initiative ever it will be up to the lawmaking body to make that.

[โ€“] Bezier@suppo.fi 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Servers cost money to operate and maintain.

They don't have do do that.

And publishers aren't interested in losing control of an IP

They don't have to do that.

or supporting them indefinitely.

They don't have to do that.

Now that I wrote that thrice, I feel like it reads as passive aggressive, but that wasn't the intention. Anyway, the only requirement is to not brick the game, which shouldn't be a problem for any game that contains a singleplayer mode.

For online-multiplayer-only games the publisher would actually have to work some solution, which costs money. I'm interested to see how that goes.

[โ€“] Cliff@feddit.org 6 points 3 months ago

They should be forced to make the server software available for self-hosting and the game itself configurable so that you can acess these alternate servers if they decide to shut down their servers.

[โ€“] Vittelius@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some sort of playable experience after official support has ended. The proposal doesn't specify what that has to look like because different games might require different solutions.

It can be a single-player mode it can be dedicated servers or p2p with an open api for third parties to handle matchmaking. It can just be adding bots.

And sometimes it just means removing always on DRM. A lot of games would be perfectly playable offline if it wasn't for that.

[โ€“] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Dedicated servers, or anything else that requires ongoing financial input from the publisher\developer is explicitly not put on the table as an option, as that would be unreasonable, and likely impact indies far worse that AAA studios.

The demand is that the game be left in a fully operational state, or be provided with the means to make that possible (server binaries, online-drm removal).

[โ€“] Vittelius@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago

I meant dedicated servers in the sense of developers releasing the server binaries for the community to host and operate.

My previous comment was easy to misunderstand in that regard, as the term describes a UX flow more than making a technical distinction

[โ€“] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 3 months ago

Once upon a time, companies released server softwares for games, there were whole companies/websites/communities dedicated to hosting servers for multiplayer games, usually distributed geographically to allow usable ping, completely outside the control of the original publisher. Modded servers for games like Quake 2 allowed very creative play.

[โ€“] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

Various ways. They could release a local server mode single player mode to play those games solo (assuming the game really does not have a proper single player architecture). Or they release the server software itself so that the community can host their own servers for others to play on.

[โ€“] pedroapero@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago