‘Giant’ 300,000-year-old handaxes unearthed in Kent (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by sabbah@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

These handaxes are so big it’s difficult to imagine how they could have been easily held and used.

While right now, we aren’t sure why such large tools were being made, or which species of early human were making them, this site offers a chance to answer these exciting questions.

I'd imagine that if you have a dead woolly mammoth with a 10cm layer of fat underneath an elephant-thick skin, it's really hard to cut through all of that to get to the meat. I'd suspect that the heavy weight of those tools made it relatively easy to cut through that, so that would only have to provide a sideways force.

I imagine it like this: You lift this large tool and jam it once into the mammoth's thick skin so that it sticks in it. Gravity is supplying most of the force necessary to cut, and all the human has to do is push and pull to the side to open up the animal to access the meat, which can then be processed with smaller hand held tools.

[-] HerbErtlinger@vlemmy.net 6 points 1 year ago

When I take my dog for a walk, he finds the biggest stick he can, whether or not he can carry it.

When I was in high school I knew a kid that loved Braveheart so much he got a reproduction of the claymore, a sword that was easily ten inches taller than him.

I think some dudes, no matter the species, just like the big pointy stick.

[-] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I think some dudes, no matter the species, just like the big pointy stick.

Yeah, sure. but those guys then get buried with their big pointy stick What we have here is a prehistoric working space, more akin to a construction site, where dozens of people together were cutting up animals and processing them. These giant handaxes are specialized tools for a specific job.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mammoths only went extinct about 4,000 years ago, so realistically we should be seeing other "giant axes" if they were for processing mammoths.

I'd guess they were more specialized tools for some sort of early construction, which is kind of even more crazy.

[-] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

so realistically we should be seeing other “giant axes” if they were for processing mammoths.

We do! Here are some from egypt, 500,000 years ago: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/researchers-in-museums/tag/handaxe/

The great Furze Platt handaxe is 400,000 years old and from Britain: https://joyofmuseums.com/museums/united-kingdom-museums/london-museums/natural-history-museum-london/great-handaxe-from-furze-platt/

And here are 300,000 thousand years old ones from Spain: https://theconversation.com/giant-handaxes-suggest-that-different-groups-of-early-humans-coexisted-in-ancient-europe-91977

Edit: On that note, here's a giant handaxe where I have no doubt believing that it could be a prestige object: The giant handaxe of West-Tofts with a carefully preserved shell!

[-] Almonds@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Makes a lot of sense with larger creatures with tougher hides. Could they be big enough that 2 people would use it together? Wouldn't it be more probable the people at the time were smaller than us now?

[-] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Why couldn't they just have tied a stick to the axe? Is it just a handaxe because people didn't do real axes yet, or another reason? Seems occam's razor that if you can't hold it it wasn't held like that.

[-] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

These things are large and heavy (don't forget that this is solid stone, not metal):

Sure, you can attach a handle to it, but for what purpose? Do you want to chop something with it repeatedly? Then your arms will very quickly become very tired from repeatedly lifting those things.

What I'm describing are tasks that don't require chopping, but cutting. Modern meat proceessing still uses knives for that, not axes or something

[-] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I see -- probably the bone breaker!

[-] ForgetReddit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Article could have used way more pictures

[-] aja@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The article references Neanderthals but Neanderthals were way more recent than ~300kya? In fact even the earliest Neanderthals were closer in time to now than then…

[-] Slappula@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe Neanderthals were much stronger then they think?

[-] TheEternalBambzip@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Boggles my mind everytime thinking of people that look like us living that far back.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023

94 points (99.0% liked)

World News

38719 readers

2663 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.