515
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The former president has always considered himself to be the ultimate disrupter. But this time, the disruption is on the other side.

Through the weekend, there were an awful lot of questions that were going back and forth from people in the president’s tightest circle, and one of the questions that kept being asked was whether Joe Biden was going to endorse Kamala Harris or not. And the question didn’t revolve around whether he wanted to or not, but whether people in her camp thought it would be better for her to fight for it, win it on her own, and not be seen as somebody who was tapped by President Biden and so, in her own way, have a fresh start going into the campaign.

So the timing seems to be about as good as it could have been to end what has just been one of the craziest two or three weeks in American politics in quite some time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 141 points 2 months ago

Can you blame him? Kamala was a District Attorney and an Attorney General. Even a competent opponent who based their arguments on facts would be intimidated.

Trump wouldn’t stand a chance on that stage.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 99 points 2 months ago

And if he ducks out hopefully she'll call him a coward. Repeatedly.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 93 points 2 months ago

She should start calling him a coward before they start negotiation. He can't stand women talking crap about him. A woman of color, he'd have a canary.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

A canary in the old mind, that's how the saying goes

[-] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

I thought it was a coronary in the gold mine.

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its coronary on the golden shrine.

Y'know, like Elvis. People are saying he looks like Elvis...

[-] quicklime@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

All this talk of coronation recently is making me dizzy.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Marty isn't the only Back To The Future character it works on?

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

I hope that Harris (or whoever) goes WAY more on the offensive than Biden did. Honestly I think that's where his age showed the most sharply; he was just too nice, even when he was "Dark Brandon."

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

I hope that Harris (or whoever) goes WAY more on the offensive than Biden did.

That wouldn't be difficult.

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Getting called a coward by a woman will break his brain beyond what it is now.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

IDK, considering the MAGA crowd consider Trump lies better than facts, because everybody know by now, that facts have a liberal bias.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 52 points 2 months ago

the fight is not for maga votes, it is for the undecided morons in the middle.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 months ago

The fight is against the couch, idiot undecided voters are basically a coin toss. Getting 80%+ of your supporters to actually vote for you is all you really need.

Nothing was more demoralizing than Biden in the last debate. Trump against someone under 60 could have the same thing happen to him.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The undecided will be gaslighted too. Are you really sugesting Trump would try to use reason to sway the undecided?
Trump has only one mode, and that's narcissistic pathological liar.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

Are you really sugesting Trump would try to use reason to sway the undecided?

no, i am suggesting that primary goal of democratic candidate is not to go after maga voters.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He needs to capture his base too, and make sure as many of them as possible will vote, without them the marginal voters are irrelevant.
Trump will use stupid arguments and lies, and look like he is winning. That's how he built the MAGA crowd, and that's the system he will continue to use.
The undecided he manages to convince to vote for him, will then be supporting MAGA by definition, even if they aren't as batshit crazy as the hardcore MAGA supporters.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 7 points 2 months ago

No, but a good and clear debater, like an experienced lawyer that she is, would blow him apart. Biden was an effective politician and debated pretty well, but its not his forte in the same way.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It would be cool if Harris can expose Trump, like Obama exposed Romney in their 2nd debate.

[-] pigup@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I vaguely remember her debate against Mike pence, her performance was not to impressive. The fly helped. I wonder if they will let her a bit looser on the pedo

[-] ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

She's been VP for a few years since then. I hope she goes for the jugular... (Metharphorically of course. Seeing as maga is suddenly quite shocked about violent language LOL)

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
515 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18966 readers
3496 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS