InsanePeopleFacebook

2635 readers

4 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world

BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world

195

A compelling theory. (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/insanepeoplefacebook@lemmy.world

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 71 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like nonsense, the pictures are swapped. Quote below from https://www.cruisemummy.co.uk/titanic-vs-olympic/

The Titanic had more irregular windows One of the few differences you can spot by looking at pictures of the Titanic and the Olympic next to each other is that the Titanic had more irregular port holes on B deck.

This is because of all the design changes that were made to that part of the ship during construction – it means that the windows were spaced out a lot more unevenly.

On the Olympic, because the plans were unchanged during construction, the windows are evenly spaced across that deck.

More importantly, even if the Olympic sank instead of Titanic, then Titanic continued serving as an ocean liner and troop ship and hospital ship for two decades, so what was the point of the fraud?

[–] rovingnothing29@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

IIRC: Olympic couldn't be insured as it was involved in a collision with HMS Hawkeye; and was found at fault by the Royal Navy. There was also damage that couldn't really be repaired resulting in an permanent slight port list and it was a floating legal liability. Titanic was insured for double its worth after this and White Star was owned by noted scumbag JP Morgan. Olympic was also being repaired at the same shipyard Titanic was being built at, making a switch that much easier.

My opinion: They swapped the boats in the yard to pass regulatory inspection for Olympic, then swapped back if there's any truth to this.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

And now they’ve snared another one

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Titanic was under insured so there’s no way they were making any money back by her sinking…

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

To your last point, the reason was that the Olympic was dealing with some manufacturing issues and couldn’t be insured unless it was basically rebuilt for a new inspection.

Instead of rebuilding it, they secretly renamed it the Titanic so it could be insured fraudulently under the Titanic’s insurance, then intentionally sank it to claim the insurance on it. Now they have a good ship (the real Titanic) which will pass inspection as the Olympic, and they have the insurance payout from the sunken Olympic which shouldn’t have been able to be insured.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Olympic was rammed by a warship which was why she was in dry dock at the same time as Titanic.