this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
428 points (93.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4089 readers
121 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

J.K. Rowling is embroiled in a fresh row with another Harry Potter actor over transgender rights.

Following exchanges of fire with Daniel Radcliffe and others, Rowling has blasted David Tennant after the Goblet of Fire star voiced strident views on those who speak out against trans rights.

During an appearance at the British LGBT Awards over the weekend, he called on British equalities minister Kemi Badenoch to “shut up” after she advocated for banning trans women from entering women’s toilets and sports teams.

In an interview at the same event, Tennant called transgender critics “a tiny bunch of little whinging f*ckers who are on the wrong side of history, and they’ll all go away soon.”

Earlier in the week, Rowling branded people like Tennant the “gender Taliban.” In posts on X (once Twitter) on Friday, she expanded her comments to address Tennant’s “wrong side of history” quote.

Rowling wrote: “This man is talking about rape survivors who want female-only care, the nurses currently suing their health trust for making them change in front of a man, girls and women losing sporting opportunities to males and female prisoners incarcerated with convicted sex offenders.”

She added: “For a man who’s supposedly a model of compassion and tolerance, he sure does want a lot of people to cease to exist.”

Previously.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Glad to not see the usual "separate the art from the artist" crowd that can't stop giving her money to continue to be a fucking plague on humanity.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What always gets me about those people is if it's real art, the artist is putting their message into the story. When I was young and in the target demographic, I stopped reading halfway through because the message of the story was getting confusing or annoying. I don't think I've ever seen a main character get more selfish in their character arc. I later found out that Harry's solution to owning a house with severed heads everywhere was to put doilies over them during the holidays.

The books are bad and where probably only tolerable in the beginning because of the editor.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Duuude. You put it so well. They fell off hard after Goblet of Fire, not that the cracks weren't showing before

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unpopular opinion, Voldemort is a boring villain with puddle deep motives. He should never have survived the first book.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing though, that kind of works for kid lit

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Well, when I was a kid, I was very surprised when he showed back up again.

[–] norimee@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

The worst is, that she feels validated in her hateful opinions by the money she makes.

[–] ytg@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

that can’t stop giving her money

well… I mean… you don't have to

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Most of them do, gladly. They just want to save face by saying they disagree with her.