this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
1755 points (98.7% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17583 readers
10 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the other guy said. It's down to the fact that you aren't actually heating/cooling down a room, you're just moving the heat already there around. E.g. in winter, instead of producing your own heat with electricity, which is 100% efficient, you take heat from the outside and put it inside, using a lot less energy in the process than if you were to create the heat inside of your home.

Though I'm not sure if it's that efficient, I think I heard it's more around the 150-200% mark, but I'm not sure.

[–] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think I heard it's more around the 150-200% mark

Most cheap air conditioners have COPs (coefficients of performance) around 3.2-3.5, which means 320-350% efficiency. In real world conditions, the best systems reach 4.5, though the theoretical limit is about 8.0.

[–] chronically_crazy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

3.2-3.5 is also on a good day. It might not be as efficient when the outside temperature differences are further away from your thermostat setting inside, though if you have a geothermal setup, then you've got peak efficiency year round.