this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
1049 points (97.9% liked)

People Twitter

5230 readers
1236 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

On the other hand, those shows hit the big reset button every week. I'd love something episodic, but what happens in previous episodes still has an effect on future episodes. Star Trek started to do that a little with DS9, but even there... O'Brien is in a mind prison for what he thinks is 20 years and he's fine in the next episode?

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago
[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I loved SG1 but they didn't do nearly enough of that. I never watched Atlantis or the other one though.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

SG-1 had a huge forward progression. At the beginning they were basically a hiking team, but by the end they had tech that surpassed Trek.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

The whole episodic vs serialised thing was pretty much during that time.

It's pretty obvious from the shows of the era.

House, for one. Earlier seasons being rather strictly episodic, and last season being a serialised joke about how ridiculous the rigid episodic nature of the earlier seasons were. Not ecactly, but..

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

He's not fine on the inside