this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
131 points (97.8% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2631 readers
273 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Why do they think that issuing licenses equates to ownership?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Because they don't understand what words mean. Something they show pretty much every time they post.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It feels like they're using the definition/use case of software licensing and applying it to motor vehicles. As in, "If I have to get a license from you, then you are the owner and I am just the licensee".

Its a bonkers misapplication of the word, but that never stops a Sovcit.

[–] hyperhypervisor@programming.dev 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

actually, that usage makes sense if you realize that you're licensing the roads, not the car.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Except the Sovcit above is extending the "license" to the equal state ownership of the car.

[–] hyperhypervisor@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

Oh I'm not defending the Sovcit in the slightest. I'm just pointing out that the license still works in the same way as a software license, but the license is for the roads.