this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
142 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flan@hexbear.net 14 points 6 months ago (6 children)

What is the vegan position on lab grown meat?

[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I once told a vegan classmate I would eat lab meat and she thought I meant Labrador meat.

[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's vegan depending on how annoying the lab is

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 18 points 6 months ago

(Non-Annoying) Animal Liberation Front

[–] Magician@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lol, it's funny how people categorize acceptable and unacceptable meat.

[–] MaeBorowski@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No actual vegan thinks any meat from a murdered animal is acceptable, it's the exploitation and killing that's the issue. They are not a vegan if they do. If you weren't saying otherwise, then yes I agree, only I wouldn't call it funny so much as pathetic how many people categorize which animals are acceptable and which aren't acceptable to be made into meat.

[–] Magician@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

Maybe I was being too glib.

I just think of how arbitrary and shallow the reasoning is. It's funny in that it's so ridiculous, I can't help but laugh when someone tries to justify why eating one animal is okay, but then say that it's more wrong to eat a horse.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago

If it's not hurting animals I would think positive?

[–] piccolo@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago

My take (as a vegan):

  • Most lab grown meat still has animal product input so it's not vegan
  • In the event that they replace that part of the production, there's still a good chance it gets tested on animals to get GRAS (generally recognized as safe) certification from the FDA. I don't eat e.g. Impossible or Just, both of which tested their food on animals to get the certification.
  • If there existed a way of synthesizing meat that didn't have animal products as input and was never tested on animals, I'd be very excited about it from the perspective of getting omnis to stop killing animals for their flesh or secretions. I probably wouldn't eat it because of the ick factor, plus health reasons, but I think it would be vegan.

I also don't think that waiting for lab grown meat before going vegan is a morally defensible position in general.

[–] ta00000@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Most ethical vegans wouldn't even have an issue with someone eating real meat sourced from a trash can. I personally wouldn't be able to eat it because I've never eaten meat in my life but I wouldn't think any less of someone for eating meat that was destined for the landfill because it doesn't contribute to the suffering of any animal.

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

In general, the more proximal to R&D, the less acceptable it is to vegans.

At these early stages, the research involves animal exploitation and killing to product the initial cells. Some of the production processes do, too. A stalwart vegan might avoid those products as a result.

Eventually, there will probably be companies and production processes that do neither and the connection to harm will be, at least psychologically, more diffuse. More vegans will be cool with it over time until none of them care outside of the issues re: normalizing meat consumption.

There are confounding factors but that's the trend.