this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
1594 points (98.8% liked)

Political Memes

5434 readers
3299 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's like we forgot why we have an economy in the first place. Wasn't it to enjoy our lives in this planet.

[–] Nom@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No only for the select few, the rest of us are serfs. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if one of the billionaires started calling themselves Ramesses XXVI or something.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Maybe we should, like, do something about them?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's the "avocado toast" people all over again. "Why are you enjoying anything in your life right now when you could be waiting to enjoy things in the last 10-20 years of your life (if you live that long)?"

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

(You'd better find a new place to live if you plan to outstay your welcome by that much though; this one won't be habitable)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Far easier said than done.

Impoverished people in inner cities do not have the means to find anywhere else to live. That's why they end up just dying during a natural disaster.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh, no, I meant earth. Whole thing.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah, well we're all fucked in that case.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Yes, but line went so far up, so worth.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

Now we have to save enjoyment for the last 1-2 months.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nope. Loot pillage and exploit. When we started this shit we had chattel slavery and proper empires.sigh.

Rape kill kill kill rape, in that order. Can't believe the rubes fell for that prosperity bullshit.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We only missed starting with no slavery by a single vote. I'm not even joking. Georgia and Carolina caused the biggest and most drawn out argument of The Continental Congress, and only managed to win by a single vote. The other 11 colonies were in favor of outlawing slavery from the start, though their stance on the natives was still crap.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Uh huh. You think the votes were honest though?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean? I'm going by the official record, which was thoroughly documented.

https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/7537

No really. Fucking ridiculous amount of paperwork for people that called themselves traitors to their king.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure but you see this in those same buildings modern day?

They need x people from their party to vote against y policy to stop it, and all of them want y to fail, so they make sure the bad thing banning y that all of them want to wring their hands over passes by exactly x votes, with a sacrificial asshole who can take the PR hit or is too old to care (let's call him Joe man).

So nobody has to deal with y, everybody other than joe-man gets to say how much they wanted y, and everybody gets to deflect criticism of themselves at joe-man.

Not a new phenomena in the parliamentary politics every onebof these blatantly conspiratorial aristocratic scumfucks would have been familiar with.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ahh, I see. Unfortunately the people that made the institutions made the mistake of believing that dishonest actors would be ferreted out by the system they were creating. That has proven to not hold up. The last time that I can think of that a SCOTUS judge resigned due to ethical questions was in the '60s or early '70s.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Believing? You think any of them were honest?

They were fucking ghouls. Kind of literally. Look up where wannabe-but-not-king george's teeth were really from.