this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
1715 points (93.1% liked)

Memes

45689 readers
1070 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
1715
I hate that guy (lemmy.ohaa.xyz)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to c/memes@lemmy.ml
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Source: https://sunny.garden/@forestine/112225175318228712

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Could you link to more information about this?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He's famously against all commercialization of the strip and I think he'd feel this similarly devalues it.

One source.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That seems to be mostly about monetization and commodification, which should already be absent from shitposting.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think he’d feel this similarly devalues it.

I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.

Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

I mean I don't want to assume he'd be alright with it therefore I won't use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Well somebody should pop over to Chagrin Falls and ask him

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Did you mean "this" stance, maybe?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I suppose that would also have worked, but no.

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago

Here is a wiki source (insert error bars here) discussion of his stance on his work being officially licensed. He thought that use of his work outside of a comic strip would cheapen the value of the strip itself. This was frusterating as a child (who wouldn't want a fucking Hobbes plushy) but now later I can see that it was at the very least a very defensible choice. Compare how people feel about C&H vs something that was commercialized to death like Garfield. Anyway, hope it's useful.