this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
419 points (98.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54655 readers
1093 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's assuming that the only potential issue you care about is tampering though

[–] viking@infosec.pub 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What else would I care for? We're talking about piracy, so I wouldn't turn the choice of a server location into a human rights debate.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can definitely care about whatever you want. Human rights aren't the only potential issue though, but there's things like eg. do you trust that you'll be able to retain control of the site. So for example if you set it up in Russia and you're not Russian, do you trust the Russian government not to pull the rug out from under your feet at some point?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 7 points 7 months ago

Well they might, even if I you were Russian. But that's what off-site backups are there for. It's less likely for them to pull control than it is for a Western platform though, so still a win vs. Github.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

What kind of logic is that? It is perfectly reasonable to care about human rights and totalitarianism but not for copyrights. In fact it seems a bit questionable that you would use the speeding ticket of online rule violations as an excuse to completely discard any other moral considerations.

Ultimately it's your choice of course, but still. Questionable reasoning

[–] eskimofry@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

(I am not the person you replied to)

The problem with this argument is that you are ruling out entire countries for the acts of corrupt governments. Thing is there is no such thing as a clean government. Everybody has skeletons in their closet.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 6 points 7 months ago

A server is an emotionless piece of hardware, regardless of where it stands. Geo-arbitration is just that, in my eyes.