this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
794 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
37
Ontario moves to allow use of Indigenous languages in legislature (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 7 months ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Ontario government house leader, Paul Calandra, this week moved to amend a standing order that previously required lawmakers to use either English or French. Following a vote, that order now allows for an “Indigenous language spoken in Canada” to be used when addressing the speaker or chamber.

Sol Mamakwa, a member of the New Democratic party who represents the Kiiwetinoong electoral district, recalled being punished for speaking Ojibwe (Anishinaabemowin) in his youth.

“I am very honoured to be able to speak today on behalf of the people of Kiiwetinoong, on behalf of the people that were never allowed to speak their language in colonial institutions,” Mamakwa told the legislature. “These racist and colonizing policies led to language loss.”

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It isn't about which language has the most speakers, it's about acknowledging history. (I mean, if "who has the most speakers" were the only important thing, French wouldn't be allowed either—Ontario is not required by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to provide provincial government services in French, but does so to some extent anyway, for historical and practical reasons.)

How the languages of large immigrant communities should be handled in official contexts is a completely separate matter from this.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Okay, bud. I was just supporting the conversation with what I thought was interesting contextual info, partially in support of your point. But I guess you couldn't miss the opportunity to virtue signal. Good job.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

I don't think they're disputing that. They're just giving numbers to answer your question. There's very few speakers of these languages, so it's probably not going to be an easy task.