Controversial - the place to discuss controversial topics

430 readers

4 users here now

Controversial - the community to discuss controversial topics.

Challenge others opinions and be challenged on your own.

This is not a safe space nor an echo-chamber, you come here to discuss in a civilized way, no flaming, no insults!

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, "trust me bro" is not a valid argument.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Hastur@sh.itjust.works

-1

How to discuss trans issues to uneducated people? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by Zirconium@sh.itjust.works to c/controversial@sh.itjust.works

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi, I have a transmasc boyfriend and am part of the LGBTQ+ alliance. However I started my first year of college and encountered uneducated men who just did not believe that trans people had their rights under attack. One of my friends even told my trans woman friend that she had more rights than him. How or what can you do to help others become educated without "debating trans existence" or starting an argument? Thank you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zirconium@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats the issue though. They dont think, Ive tried asking them about stuff and they'll parrot things like "puberty blockers kill people." then I show them that study was wrong and they just dont believe me lol.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So your only example is a strawman nobody believes?

[–] Zirconium@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People actually use "puberty blockers are harmful" as an actual argument so I dont think its that hard to believe.

Heritage Foundation (Youtube)

The Federalist

Western Journal

Texas banning puberty blockers and hormone treatment

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Why are you linking the Federalist?

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol you've already pivoted your argument. Seems you're the one incapable of good faith interaction