this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
314 points (97.9% liked)

News

23300 readers
3928 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

How would (forced) addiction treatment hurt the most vulnerable?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For one thing, it's extremely difficult to force someone out of an addiction. You usually have to want to quit in order for that to be an option. Otherwise you have to do something like torture them by making them go through a possibly extremely painful cold turkey withdrawal.

So I'd say torturing the most vulnerable would hurt them.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But what makes you think that's what they'll do? Would helping someone with an addiction towards treatment really 'torture' them?

Breed’s office has said the measure was intentionally designed to be flexible on the treatment component. Treatment options could range from out-patient services to a prescription for buprenorphine, a medication used to treat addiction. They noted it doesn’t include a requirement for participants to remain sober, recognizing that people often lapse in recovery and shouldn’t be kicked out of the program for a slip-up.

[–] evergreen@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thank you! People here getting all riled up without even reading the damn article. What else is new?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I am SO TIRED of articles about SF ending up in a national or global forum where people start complaining about stuff that SF is light years ahead on.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You asked about forced addiction treatment. Not this specific program.

There are a lot of times people are forced to have addiction treatment, especially by judges. And it is a form of torture.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, fair enough. But I don't think many treatment programs still make them go cold turkey though. Of course it's always 'less fun' than just continuing shooting fentanyl, even for those who freely make the change

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What? You think fentanyl addicts use it for fun? They probably didn't even start using opioids for fun. They probably started because they were in pain.

Also, if they stop using opioids they will be in a lot more pain and they will still be living in America, where a for-profit medical system to treat that pain is beyond their reach.

It's not about fun at all. What an incredibly insensitive thing to say.

[–] evergreen@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If they don't get help to stop, they eventually progress to a point where they are definitely not using for fun. They have no choice anymore. They have one goal and that is to be high at any cost. I work in a part of SF where there are a lot of them and the things I see them go through are horrendous. It feels like watching state sanctioned torture. They are literally being left to rot. I know two people that have lost a loved one to fentanyl and it really is heartbreaking.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Again- many fentanyl addicts are people in actual physical pain. The whole reason there is an opioid epidemic in the first place is that opioids used to be handed out by doctors like candy and tons of people got addicted.

Claiming they're doing it for fun is simply insensitive and you should ask those two people why they lost those loved ones- what got them addicted in the first place.

I've had fentanyl in a hospital. It's not something pleasurable.

[–] evergreen@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Jeez yeah thankfully I've never had to experience fent myself. I did get some Molly one time that was cut with meth, and that was a huge eye opener for me... different drug but still.

I do know the back story to one of the victims. He was just a dude that got caught up in the party scene too much. Was always using more and more as time went on. People even told him he was going to die someday. Sure enough, he had another party at his place, and in the early morning, people found him lying on the floor of his room, partially in a closet, dead. Fentanyl OD.

As if that wasn't bad enough, some of the people came back and took shit from his house after they learned he died. Ugh

I have spoken to some on the street though that did indeed get hooked originally from a pain script. It's definitely a thing.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Are you saying no-one is using opiates recreationally? Or that people get addicted because it makes them feel so incredibly bad? People I know that dose some special K at a festival don't really do so to ease their back pain...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I'm saying that the current opioid crisis was caused by people in legitimate physical pain being oversupplied opioids by doctors due to companies like Purdue Pharma pushing them on doctors. So a large number of fentanyl addicts are taking it because they have legitimate pain issues which also need to be addressed.

[–] braxy29@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

beyond that forced treatment is ethically questionable, conditioning other forms of help on sobriety puts people in a bind. it's hard for people to get and stay sober when they're suffering, physically and mentally.

housing/food/health care (to include mental health and psychiatric care) first means it's more likely that efforts toward sobriety will even work.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

conditioning other forms of help on sobriety puts people in a bind.

This bill explicitly does not do that.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Forced addiction treatment isn't what's happening. They drug test the poor and then cut them off from benefits if they fail. It is a punishment.

The only way to be eligible for benefits again is to join a treatment program, many of which in the US are just religious ministries that care more about proselytizing than human outcomes. Even cults like the Church of Scientology runs drug treatment programs, with obvious motivations...

These people are exploited by pretty much everyone, including those who are tasked to help them. If your solution is to force them into anything, recovery or otherwise, you're just exploiting them further.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

You really need to read the article

[–] evergreen@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

From the article:

Breed’s office has said the measure was intentionally designed to be flexible on the treatment component. Treatment options could range from out-patient services to a prescription for buprenorphine, a medication used to treat addiction. They noted it doesn’t include a requirement for participants to remain sober, recognizing that people often lapse in recovery and shouldn’t be kicked out of the program for a slip-up.