137
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
137 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15897 readers
319 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Just memeing. I don't think it's invented by the CIA, I am just infuriated by the fact that any critical thought about our system gets met with a ready-made thought terminating cliché, and the worst of the bunch is, to me, these short hands like Occam's Razor, which I exclusively see used by fart smellers thinking they're smart fellas.
Tbh, I feel like people abuse Occam's Razor anyway.
Even if it's a logical thing to use, the way it's used is, err, illogical.
Yeah that's mainly my.issue with it. With all the rhetorical and deductive tools really. I've never seen "ad hominem" used in good faith, and I've never seen "Occam's razor" invoked in an argument for a conspiracy. It's always done by dumb redditors thinking they're being clever and like Sherlock Holmes
Tbh, a lot of things are "ad hominems;" people do it all the time in arguments and I think it's wrong, but it's a logical fallacy with a bias when it's ever invoked.
"Whataboutism" is an argument that's still invoked, but us MLs know that one well lmao
FRIENDLY FIRE FRIENDLY FIRE WATCH OUT ITS GONE ROGUE
Oh I'm not against the fallacies per se, just like I'm not against the concept of deductive reasoning/tools. I just never see them get used right or by unobnoxious people. And hominem is the Hall of Famer to me, because it's just become synonymous with "you insulted me" when you can insult people without it being an ad hominem easily.
Right, and to be honest, with the discourse on the Internet in general, they've become "thought-terminating epithets," as my friend likes to say.
TIL what an epithet is
Yeah, that's the term my friend uses.
"Thought-terminating epithet."
Though he was talking about the term "revisionist" (when MLs call each other that, for example, without really getting to the crux of why they disagree).
Fellers would make it rhyme better with smellers btw
Works either way for people with non-rhotic accents!
Yeah but the grammar? I thought fella was the right spelling?
The English language
It's a misspelling either way, it's saying "fellow" but with an accent/dialect. I saw "fellers" in the subtitles for Red Dead Redemption 2 last night so it's definitely used
It's a great play on words though you should definitely keep using it
Not mine sadly, but yeah it's a banger. Gonna adopt the better spelling from now - It's the idea of a smart fellow to the fart smellows
I think both "fella" and "feller" are slang versions of "fellow".