this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
359 points (94.1% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2428 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Awful TLDR. Talks about Glazer, says he then she.

[–] zerofk@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I often feel this bot is no better than selecting random bits from an article. I’m exaggerating a bit, but it’s clear the bot doesn’t actually understand the essence of what’s written.

That said, I do still appreciate it for getting at least a gist of what an article is about. And I very much appreciate the people working on it and making it available.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yep. Often this sort of summary is generated by finding the most interconnected parts of text, and assuming they are the most important, then slapping them together. While it generally does pull out the most relevant bits, there's no guarantee that they'll make contextual sense together.

Once you understand how it works and its shortcomings, you can make better use of it as a tool.

[–] halva@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

I mean, it's a bot that just selects pseudorandom bits of the article, there's nothing else to it.