this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
17 points (90.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54577 readers
216 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have seen that Ventura has much tighter inspections of modifications to executables. From that article :

The more stringent codesigning checks in Ventura verify that all notarized apps are correctly signed and have not been modified by unauthorized processes, even after the first launch. This is an improvement from previous versions of macOS, where Gatekeeper would only validate applications during their initial launch and would regard the file as trusted once it was successfully launched.

Should I stick with the previous MacOS version for as long as possible? I really don't want to have to give money to fucking Adobe.

spoilerAlso - shut up, the apple lappie was literally half price because of a superficial tiny dent on one corner. I mostly use Linux.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

I don't use MacOS, but it seems like you can disable Gatekeeper with the command line. I doubt a change in its behavior would make a difference if it's disabled in the first place.