this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
677 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3368 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) suggested Monday that Russian President Vladimir Putin has some sort of financial influence over former President Trump.

In an interview with MSNBC’s “Inside with Jen Psaki,” Pelosi said Putin is the “richest person in the world” and has “stiff competition” to being named the most evil person in the world.

Pelosi asked “what does he have on Donald Trump that he’d have to constantly be catering to Putin?”

Her comments came just after Trump doubled down on his criticism of NATO and said he would encourage Russia to attack U.S. allies who fail to reach the alliance’s defense spending goals. Trump has also declined to criticize Putin for the death of opposition leader Alexei Navalny in a Russian prison last week.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago (5 children)

This kind of adroit aloofness to reality is why Democrats struggle so hard.

The easiest to punch opponents they'll ever have, but they wont take a meaningful swing.

Come out and full throatedly say that voting Republican in 2024 is anti-Democratic and fascist. Fight while we've still got a chance.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't help that she's accusing everyone of being paid off by Putin or the Chinese. The last ones she accused were pro-ceasefire activists because she can't imagine anyone would organically come to the conclusion that bombing babies is bad.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

She is herself full of Chinese influence

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I read about Germany and the street fights against the Nazi party brownshirts and wonder how much further until we start doing the same with red hat wearing people...

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What do you think 2016-2021 was? Just because you weren't out in the streets punching Nazis and confronting racism and fascism directly doesn't mean that others weren't.

I would say we're on the other side of that page.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Where I live protests are usually about strikes. Unfortunately a large reason is because this once blue state is now orange around the mouth.

[–] Fal@yiffit.net -3 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

They're all domestic terrorists now.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Was she wrong about that? If anything, she was being generous by saying it was only half of his supporters.

[–] Fal@yiffit.net 1 points 8 months ago

No, not wrong at all. But the person was saying that democrats are stupid for not doing exactly what they did in '16