this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
1211 points (99.6% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2266 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Plastic producers have known for more than 30 years that recycling is not an economically or technically feasible plastic waste management solution. That has not stopped them from promoting it, according to a new report.

“The companies lied,” said Richard Wiles, president of fossil-fuel accountability advocacy group the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which published the report. “It’s time to hold them accountable for the damage they’ve caused.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Also don’t be fooled by people claiming plastics can be burnt cleanly.

Not seeing why not. I did help work on a place that did that. Could you explain what you mean?

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

best case, you're releasing extra CO2 into the atmosphere that would have at least been locked up in the landfills/seas of microplastics. worst case, you're also releasing unstudied and most likely carcinogenic incomplete combustion products.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but that CO2 is already up here. Why is it better to pull up more oil instead?

As for the incomplete combustion products we had scrubbers.

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I'm in favor of not using plastics at all (or at least only used in medical and scientific applications in which it is absolutely necessary). My point was that burning it is trading one set of problems for another.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ok well that isn't happening.

I have been in waste of all sorts for the bulk of my career. Deal with the world as it is not as I want it to be. So given that we do use plastic the question is what do we do with it. Recycling or burning it for fuel are possible answers. If/when it is pretty much banned then it won't be a big deal.

Got to say I felt really good working on that project. I built the scrubber system, keeping all the nasty stuff out of the exhaust.

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I certainly wasn't intending to imply your work is not worthwhile, and I apologize if i came off as combative or dismissive. Plastic recycling is such a scam, I do think burning it makes sense in the short term (especially with the scrubbers you talked about, those sound cool and will at least help with the microplastic problem). I guess it's just that the marketing push to conflate "clean" with "green" has been bothering me recently, and, while perfect should not be the enemy of the good, we're running out of time (or possible have already run out of time, depending on how depressed i am when you ask me) for incremental change to be sufficient. But, you are right. We can only do what we can to make the world we're currently in better, not simply will it into perfection overnight (despite how much I hate not being able to do that...).

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No worries. I would like to point out that plastic broken down still has uses. Example we have been using it in sewage plants for the past few years with polishing ponds. Basically increases the surface area and gives the bacteria a place to hide out when there is a die off. The rough texture of shredded plastic pieces has a high surface to volume ratio. Decreasing the time it takes to process more poop. Part of the many reasons why modern wastewater treatment plants don't smell as bad as they used to.

Yeah if you want to know about wet scrubbers just ask. Basically imagine a smokestack with nozzles. A liquid rains down as the gas goes up. The liquid picks up stuff from the gas. Then the liquid is processed. Devil is with the details with this stuff but the concept is over a century old.

For that plant I worked on the plastic was heated up with waste heat from another plant (cogeneration) in a low oxygen environment producing syngas. The syngas is scrubbed and then burned for fuel. Long term the plan for places like that is to convert the gas into liquid fuel.

Now I agree we use way too much plastic I would however like to point out that the same process we used to burn it could be used for pretty much all C-H stuff. Paper, wood, food waste, etc. the vast majority of household waste. According to the EPA IF garbage plants are run well they have the least environmental impact. It is is a big if granted.

Basically give me a trillion dollars and garbage will be solved. You do have a trillion dollars right?

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That got me thinking about the plastic-eating bacteria that keeps getting discovered in landfills... Do you think the polishing ponds might also be a good place to look? Or maybe the evolutionary pressure just isn't there like it is in landfills since there's so much poop to eat, haha.

Using waste heat to generate syngas sounds cool. So we're at least getting more out of the fuel, and i guess locking that energy away again, for a time at least.

I'm actually kind of jealous of you now. It must be nice to be making such a tangible difference. I'm a computational chemist, and while I wanted to work in materials (making better solar panels or better batteries, to be specific), I ended up in drug design and discovery. I know I am making a difference too; compared to what big-pharma is doing, our process reduces the amount of wet-lab work required to discover a new drug -- so, less lab waste (which is mostly plastic), reduced usage of chemical reagents (which often require fossil fuels to make and need to be disposed of responsibly), etc. But it's much harder to see the impact since it is so indirect.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

That got me thinking about the plastic-eating bacteria that keeps getting discovered in landfills… Do you think the polishing ponds might also be a good place to look? Or maybe the evolutionary pressure just isn’t there like it is in landfills since there’s so much poop to eat, haha.

I am not sure. The water after that just enters the rivers.

I’m actually kind of jealous of you now. It must be nice to be making such a tangible difference.

I have had more R&D type roles in my career and decided it wasn't for me. I wouldn't let it get to you, it really is a grass is greener type of deal. I am sitting there fiddling with a valve and ordering parts wishing I could get to use some of that heavy math that I learned.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm definitely game for this I have been looking for hemp based clothing, but it is always so pricey.

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd totally be willing to spend twice as much if it was gonna last twice as long, and i'd spend three times as much if additionally no exploitative practices were involved in the making of the clothing. I'm still over here wearing 10 year old clothes, partially because they have outlasted a lot of my newer clothes, partially because i don't care about fashion trends, and partially because i get paralyzed thinking about all the injustice that must have occured for this shirt to only cost $20 or whatever. Oh, and plastic-blend fabrics make me itchy and/or sweaty.

I started just buying stuff from Goodwill. At least that way i know sweatshop owners aren't getting any of my money, and if it ends up being cheaply made i only spent a couple of bucks on it (though that seems to be a decently rare problem, cheaply made items tend not to last long enough to make it to Goodwill in the first place). It takes some digging, but i can almost always find something good. Some of my better finds even had the original tag still on!

I should check out the hemp socks/undies situation, though: can't get that at Goodwill!

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I just want hemp to become commonplace once more and not some expensive niche item

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I was thinking about the plastic problem the other day and how humans could go about simply banning plastics cold turkey. I was curious what that would look like.

As a "fun" experiment, go through your place of residence and identify every item made with plastic. Now imagine each item eradicated or reinvented to eliminate plastic.

[–] bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The alternative is many of those products would just never be made. Which, for a good many of them, is overall a good thing.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I don't disagree. I just found it interesting to consider how much crap we've made with plastic. It's kind of horrifying.