this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
169 points (96.7% liked)

World News

39032 readers
3101 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with everything there but a ban on short distance flights. If the prices reflect the costs let people fly.

[–] bossito@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] quirzle@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the point he's making is that our second bullet of your list would make the third bullet unnecessary.

[–] bossito@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's some redundancy, but a ban solves the issue instantly and also creates a strong incentive for better ground transport.

[–] quirzle@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Fair enough; I wasn't commenting on the idea one way or another, just trying to clarify what I thought the other commenter meant.

Personally, I'm almost never in favor of a ban. I'd rather tax heavily and use the income for programs to offset. I'm 20 years removed from optimism about reducing emissions, so I think we should be leaning into technology that can actively pull stuff out of the atmosphere. That could create an incentive to move away from flying but also use the flying that's still happening to fund figuring out how to reverse the damage that's already been done.