this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
1090 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2357 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial gun safety bill requiring gun owners to forfeit their ability to wear or carry without firearm liability insurance.

Introduced by Del. Terri Hill, D-Howard County, the legislation would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

"A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained and it covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation reads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Nobody should be carrying as a routine.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ideally, but shits crazy. I'm a transgender woman and like a third of this country proudly wants me dead and some of them are willing to make it happen.

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is your gun keeping a third of your country at bay?

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Ya, I brandished my weapon and 100 million people said "whoa there partner!".

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they see you with a firearm, it will be all these excuse they need.

Don't fall for the pro-gun bullshit. Equal access to firearms means nothing because violence always favors the biggest asshole.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Don't tell transwomen how to live their lives. Whatever you are, you do not live up to your username.

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Whiteknighting without adding anything? Should transwomen be allowed to say anything, and no one can disagree?

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Spare me the feigned alliance. You're rushing to defend the gun lobby, not the trans community.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

LoL, is that all you've got left? You think conservatives ever encourage armed transpersons? After all I said to you, the courtesy I extended, you think it was all just bad faith? I wasn't even rude. You're as dense as any conservative. Read my history.

What do you think John Brown would say to you? He was an agitator.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Why would they care? They're making millions of dollars off "armed leftists" who aren't the slightest threat to them.

They put $16 million of those profits each year into the pockets of the most far-right Republicans running.

The far-right shitheads you're enabling go on monthly killing sprees targeting minorities. Meanwhile, whats your Nazi body count? Zero?

Do you need some names and addresses? I can hook you up. I'm talking swastika tattoo, mask off, proud boys.

Face it, everything you're doing is working out great for fascists. You couldn't have been more help if you joined them.

But it's all worth it right, because now the trans community is... oh, much less safe and accepted than they would be in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK and most of Europe.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So long as there are actual Nazis around, there exists a strong argument for it.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nazis that have all the guns they could ever want and routinely go on killing sprees with them.

So what exactly is the argument? That maybe one day, the gun laws that armed Nazis might disarm Nazis, even though they'he completely failed to for their last 5 years?

Stop falling for bullshit gun-lobby marketing.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Fine, you can choose to be utterly helpless when the nazis break down your door, and you will then go wherever they tell you. But at that point you can feel free to stop pretending you own the high road. And stop telling those of us who would fight back effectively that we have no such right.

The gun lobby absolutely does not market to people like me. Gun laws will never disarm nazis, only the minorites they wish to oppress.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

This law isn't about having guns in your house. It's about having guns at the movie theater.

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Guns are practical tools in rural areas. In town though? Nah.