this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
83 points (96.6% liked)

Canada

7311 readers
753 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Industry Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne says he's 'disappointed' in the lack of transparency Canadian grocery store giants have offered so far when it comes to tackling food inflation. He's sending a letter to Canada's Commissioner of Competition to express his dissatisfaction.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Tax them > They increase prices to compensate > They sell essential products so people still need to buy

The only way you can break them is by creating a non profit crown corporation to compete with them.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The point of marginal taxes is to make it acceptable to turn a reasonable profit, but taxes get more and more punitive as profits go up, and thusly price gouging isn't really worth the effort.

It still incentivizes making money but rather than taking those profits and grinding employees, suppliers and customers, you're incented to invest that money back into the business. You can still make millions or billions in revenue and make a reasonable profit, but instead of Galenm, senior leaders and laerger shareholders making bank, the profits go either to wages, facilities or (if you don't raise pay or invest) to the government.

This is, incidentally, how it all worked prior to 1980 or so, when we had a functioning social safety net.

Put it this way: if Weston is already a multibillionaire and still makes $300M/y in salary and comp, plus additional bonuses, then we're not taxing Loblaw enough. Could they raise prices? Sure, they could, but why, because they don't make enough billions yet?

Nuts to this idea of "if we tax them, they'll raise prices and/or leave". I've had enough of being blackmailed by billionaires. They need us to buy their stuff and back their wealth; we don't need them. If, eg, Loblaw wants to raise prices to maintain unreasonable post-tax profits, someone else can step in and do the same thing and charge less, and Galen can fuck off.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We're talking about essential products. No matter the price people need to eat so from the get go the "price gouging isn't worth the effort" argument goes out the window.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

99% of the products in a grocery store are not essential.

Essential foods are things like flour and oil and potatoes.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

To miss the point by that much you must have done it on purpose

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They make most of their money on luxury items and processed foods, not essentials.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's ok buddy, no need to reply anymore, you've proven you're an idiot already, we get it.