this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
343 points (97.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44184 readers
2111 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Brought to you by my discovery that some people think that “the customer is always right” isn’t the slogan of a long-dead department store, but rather it’s an actual call the cops law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MobileSuitBagera@lemmy.fmhy.ml 79 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yay! I have one. We had a customer grab a product from a spot on the shelf next to where it was normally stocked. The spots have labels indicating the price of the item. This person argued that because the product was in the wrong spot they should only have to pay the price of the item that should have been there. The prices also include the name of the product. The reason the the product was taking up space in the next spot was because we had sold out due to the item being deeply discounted because we were discontinuing it. When we explained that they began accusing us of false advertising and threatened to call the better business bureau. They admitted that they knew it was the wrong product but insisted that because it wasn't shelved in the right spot that was some kind of loophole. I gave a firm no and then they asked to speak to a manager. I fucked off it was taken care of.

[–] SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also work front end, I've had sooo many people give me this shit.

#1 Not advertising. Advertising is what you see before you enter the building. Some stores don't even have shelf labels.

#2 Do you think someone can walk up to your garage sale and slap their own sticker that says $1 and demand you sell them a TV for $1? No, you can refuse to sell your own shit whenever you want. It's YOUR shit. You can burn it in front of them if you felt like it.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not really the case in most of the EU.

It doesn't count obviously if it's a misplaced item and the price is clearly labelled for another item. However, if a store leaves discount stickers on some product late, or mislabels some price, they are obligated to sell at that price. There is caveat that it only works if the price is believable, but I managed to get a ton of shrimp that just arrived at a Lidl 90% off one time. Family was eating shrimp for weeks.

[–] CrispyCactus@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

My dad and I were shopping at Home Depot one December and found a small Christmas decoration I wanted. When we got it to the register the cashier couldn't find a tag or sticker on it. Normally I'd go get another one with a tag but this was the only one they had. The cashier tried looking it up through the computer system but still couldn't figure it out. She handed it to us and told us it was free because it was the store's fault that she couldn't find the price.

We've been enjoying that decoration for years, my mom still puts it in the middle of her kitchen display. And we always remember how nice that cashier was to us.

[–] pandarisu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I used to work in a supermarket in the UK about 20 years ago. The store is not legally required to sell anything to anyone (as long as it's not because they are discriminating against a protected characteristic), so the workaround for the store was to say that the item was no longer for sale and to remove it from the shop floor (presumably fixing the labeling, then putting the stock back out)

[–] Flygone@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Where in the EU would that be the case?

AFAIK a legally binding contract only happens once you actually exchange money for a product. That should be true pretty much all over the world as long as there's actual laws/customs regulating this process.

Any prices/offers or whatever else you might see in or around a store are in no way legally binding no matter how believable the prices are.

Otherwise anyone can just run around with a 10/20/50% off sticker and force any store to sell them whatever they want for much cheaper.

[–] SWW13@lemmy.brief.guru 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least in Germany that's the case.

Every contract is legally binding in Germany, even verbal contracts or in this case price tags (to some degree). Obviously other laws may invalidate them and verbally is hard to prove. For example if you advertise onetime off prices for a week to lure people in the store you have to have a reasonable amount of these items to be available through the week, otherwise people are eligible to get the offer or compensation.

Adding your own sticker would probably be fraud and easy to prove for the store (not matching sticker, no plans to reduce prices, ...).

[–] UtiAnimi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Every contract is legally binding in Germany, even verbal contracts or in this case price tags (to some degree).

This seems to be contrary to what I can find. A price tag is not a contract but an "invitatio ad offerendum" so an invitation for the customer to make an offer at the checkout. Then a contract is created when the cashier accepts this price after scanning it and matching it with the price in their system. Therefore it's not the price tag that counts but the price in the cash register. I could be wrong or the law has changed in the last 1-2 years, but I found this information here (sorry they are all in german):

https://www.mdr.de/ratgeber/recht/preisbindung-supermarkt-regal-kasse-100.html

https://www.test.de/Verbraucherrecht-Regal-oder-Kasse-welcher-Preis-gilt-5115345-0/

https://www.verbraucherzentrale-niedersachsen.de/themen/kaufen-reklamieren/regal-kasse-welcher-preis-gilt

[–] SWW13@lemmy.brief.guru 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah you're right, looks like I've mixed up something.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

Otherwise anyone can just run around with a 10/20/50% off sticker and force any store to sell them whatever they want for much cheaper.

Or they can just steal it, it's just as legal. In my experience this is law in a lot of the EU, including Germany and a bunch of Eastern European places.

In my case, it wasn't a misplaced 90% off sticker, it was just that the normal price tag on the shelf was printed with one zero less. It was also a "premium" item at the time, so the price wasn't that much off, just cheap. It wasn't just a bunch of shrimp, it was ready made, cleaned, arranged into a neat circle with dipping sauces in the middle.

On the other hand, I had a thing where Microsoft was introducing Skype to a country where the local currency was around 200:1 to the dollar. They messed up the currency conversion, and it defaulted back to 1:1, giving everyone a 99.5% discount on consumer electronics. It was obviously not honoured, and the law was clear, so no lawsuits either.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

In most of US, the price tag is a legally binding offer, and its presence is required by law in most cases. Here for example is NYC law:

New York City Administrative Code
Title 20: Consumer and Worker Protection
Chapter 5: Unfair Trade Practices
Subchapter 2: Truth-in-Pricing Law
§20-708 Display of total selling price by tag or sign.

All consumer commodities, sold, exposed for sale or offered for sale at retail except those items subject to section 20-708.1 of this code, shall have conspicuously displayed, at the point of exposure or offering for sale, the total selling price exclusive of tax by means of (a) a stamp, tag or label attached to the item or (b) by a sign at the point of display which indicates the item to which the price refers, provided that this information is plainly visible at the point of display for sale of the items so indicated. This section shall not apply to consumer commodities displayed in the window of the seller.

§ 20-708.1 Item pricing.

e. Price accuracy. No retail store shall charge a retail price for any stock keeping item, whether or not exempt under subdivision c of this section, which exceeds the lower of any item, shelf, sale or advertised price of such stock keeping item.

City inspectors may perform random checks to compare tag price to scanner price at checkout and fine store $25-$100 for every incorrect/missing tag, and may repeat the inspections every 24 hours until problem is solved.

If you run around slapping your own discount stickers it wouldn't count since the store didn't do it, you are just committing fraud. The store would be on the hook if it continued to display the fraudulently-mislabeled product for sale after being made aware of it.

[–] Okalaydokalay@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it were that easy, then anyone could just move anything they want anywhere in the store.

Why yes, this PS5 in the candy bar aisle for $3, I will take 5 at that price.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Reminds me of a really old Saturday Night Live “commercial” for a supermarket price gun. They showed a person shopping for all sorts of premium goods (steaks, etc) and re-labeling them all as something like $0.79, and the cashier blindly ringing them up for that price.

Granted that was from probably 30+ years ago now…

[–] Stan@lemmywinks.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=k1S6UMhQKkc&pp=ygUYU25sIHByaWNlIGd1biBjb21tZXJjaWFs

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Here's example language from New York City law:

All consumer commodities ... shall have ... a sign at the point of display which indicates the item to which the price refers, provided that this information is plainly visible at the point of display for sale of the items so indicated.

So it is a question of whether the product spilling over to an adjacent shelf still has a "plainly visible" price tag. If it were on a wrong shelf entirely it would not, and here there is some ambiguity, but city inspectors can be pretty strict and demand items stay within the lines. If it is decided the price was not plainly visible, the store may be fined $25-$100 per violation per day. In any case, the customer would not be calling "better business bureau" (which is just yelp from before the internet), but the Commissioner of Department of Consumer and Worker Protection. And the customer would also not get to pay the lower price for the other product if it is clear it is a different product, as the customer admits they knew. (The question would be different if there were ambiguity).

However, the point that I specifically object to is the opinion that it was preposterous for the customer to claim some legal right in this situation, the implication that no such right exists. The language of the law does exist (at least in some jurisdictions), and violations do carry legal penalties.