this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
775 points (95.6% liked)

People Twitter

5466 readers
909 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is it really that different than saying "Audience"? Or radio shows referring to "listeners"? Etc.

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or "y'all"

Saying "chat" to address a group or room full of people isn't different at all from addressing them as "y'all"

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Regional differences :)

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Except y'all is a second person plural, and I think 'chat' here is still functioning as a noun.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems like the same thing to me. I think the person saying it's the first of its kind is wrong, but it would still be equally bizarre if people were addressing their "listeners" in normal conversation.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Be sure to smash that blue arrow, and follow on Kbin.

[–] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it would be weird to say 'listeners' when talking to a group. But social conventions and language shifts. "chat" has established itself for pretty obvious reasons, so I'm not surprised to see it catch on in the physical world. It's a bit like people saying 'lol' in person was super weird at first, but isn't that weird any more.

Also, I don't think it is anywhere near as weird as how politicians address what they are saying to "Mr. Speaker" when they are clearly actually not talking to that person at all.

[–] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you and Stamets related? I keep mixing you two up.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haha, no - we're two different people who are both Star Trek fans and post on Lemmy a lot.

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you're related (by Star Trek)

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Baines@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

my-brother-in-trek you need to stop

Or on a serial killer podcast, run by 35yo ladies, "murder muffins"

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Ladies and Gentlemen

Friends

Guys

[To the] Saints in Ephesus

Gentlemen of the jury

Kids!

Class

Respected Members of the Lemeritus Comment Section Elle

[the] House