this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
527 points (96.6% liked)

News

23296 readers
4413 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The only way I could reasonably see that is if those people bought houses when rates went up. I live in a high cost of living area and $150k would not be living paycheck to paycheck for my family (wife, 2 kids, and a dog). I guess I also don't have expensive tastes.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Define high cost living area. Wife with 2 kids and a pet, I assume you're going to need at least a 3 bedroom condo for a modest living arrangement.

Where I live, southern California, the average cost for a 3br condo is $4k per month. Mortgages at this time would be way more (standard 20% down).

Someone else estimated 150k is around 8.7k a month after taxes. So that's already almost half your income just for a roof over your head.

Include the expense of kids, student loans, car loans, health insurance, etc. Yeah, paycheck to paycheck isn't unrealistic.

Not everyone was lucky enough to be in the financial place in their life to buy a house 5 years ago.

[–] bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I'm gonna go ahead and tell you, that's a bit high for after tax.

I make 172/year and after tax and benefits and what not in South Carolina, I'm at 8.6 a month, which is less than the 150 estimate. So in an average tax state and making 20k less? Might be more like 7.5-8.

Edit: granted of course, 401k contribution can change things a bunch

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Fair enough. I'm sure there's a calculator to make it easy per state. But yeah, take home is deceptive, because typically someone making that kind of income is going to have health insurance contributions, retirement contributions, social security (not technically income tax, but fair enough to deduct IMO) taken directly out of their paycheck.

Without doing the estimates myself, either of your claims sound plausible, and even taking 8.7k as a generous estimate, it doesn't look good.

[–] bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

and even taking 8.7k as a generous estimate, it doesn't look good.

Big facts. Worker wages need to be adjusted for the last ${years since Reagan took office and initially screwed everything up for the common American} and then we should be okay.

[–] servermonky@lemmy.today 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My family is very similar. We aren't quite paycheck to paycheck, but things feel a lot tighter than they did before - we make 190 ish combined, which ends up being about 9k a month. We have one paid off car.

Mortgage - $2500 Utilities - $800 (electric, water, plain Internet and mnvo cell phone plan) Daughter's school - $1200/mo (obv this is a "non essential", but it's pretty cheap for a year round private school) Prescriptions - $1200/mo with insurance (although this usually comes in a single lump in January. Insurance also refuses to cover a few essentials which we pay out of pocket for, about $100/mo) Student loans - $800/mo

Which leaves us with around $2500/mo for entertainment, car/house repair (it's 40 years old and needs new things like a roof or hot water heater from time to time), groceries, any vacations, etc. My wife and I both have chronic conditions which are exhausting to deal with so we get house cleaning for $300/mo as well.

We are doing fine, but it seems like an exhausting cycle to try and build savings, and if we ever had to buy another car I don't know how we would swing an extra $500 payment every month, with what it seems vehicles cost these days.

All this to say, while we are ok, I have no idea how families making under 100k get by.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Most people are not paying $1200/month for childcare or $300/month for a maid. They also probably put a lot less toward retirement.

That said, good on you for recognizing that the average household is struggling.

[–] servermonky@lemmy.today 2 points 11 months ago

Sure, for school age kids like my daughter that is true, but I will push back that toddler and infant childcare is, on average, extremely expensive.

If you don't have a grandparent or other relative to watch your kid, in a state like North Carolina you will be forking out around $800-900 a month per kid on average.

Which is why publicly funded options for preschool would be life-changing for so many people, especially single mothers and fathers.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I live in Seattle. Like I said, I can see this being true for people who got a mortgage at 5+%. But I don't think a third of people got houses at that rate so it would likely be closer $3k. Here the average 3br is around $3k/month.

But you missed one large part of the headline. It's people making $150k or more. So that includes a ton of people that make more than that. And also a ton of people not in SoCal or other HCOL areas.

[–] bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

To be fair, I live in a low cost of living area and having purchased a house this past January, if I dropped to 130k I might be paycheck to paycheck after a while. Which, granted is lower than the survey.

This being said, my mortgage payment is only $50 more than what my rent was about to increase to, because landlords are the devil.

I also didn't get a big house, it was well under the national average for cost and size, very much a "starter house". But still over 300k, because housing is a nightmare.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

I'm somehow sure that plenty of people were still buying houses when rates went up. Once again, people blaming choices and circumstances. It feels eerily similar to how people judge the homeless and talk about their "bad choices."