406
submitted 10 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

If the average American were asked what they imagine the priorities of the feminist movement are these days, most people would likely cite concerns like "fighting abortion bans" or "getting justice for sexual violence victims" or boring mainstays like "equal pay for equal work." But if you listen in to the world of right-wing social media influencers, they have a different answer. To them, feminists are single-mindedly obsessed with destroying women who identify as "tradwives."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vant@lemm.ee 53 points 10 months ago

These are the fantasies of rich grifter assholes like Steven Crowder. They still pretend it's the 50's when most households could function on just one salary. The reality is that 95% of American households can't survive on a single income. This is not the reality for most couples. These ideas are just as unpopular as abortion bans. They live in this weird bubble where they think women want to return to servitude and have prove they "deserve" a divorce. It's a fantasy. It's not going to happen, boys.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 43 points 10 months ago

The reality of feminism, though, is that if a woman truly desired to be that kind of wife, they'd 100% have that choice. That is kind of the entire point of feminism. If that's the woman they want to be, then more power to them.

But they also want to be sure women aren't being coerced, blackmailed, etc., into that subservient position. Because that's the most important part. It must be her decision.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

Sure, feminist ideals require any woman to be free to choose a Leave It To Beaver lifestyle. But that still doesn't make it a realistic lifestyle for most people, because feminism won't provide the means to pay for it.

And just as freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences, feminism doesn't mean I can't find certain people's life choices revolting. People who advocate the "tradwife" lifestyle aren't doing so in a vacuum; it's very much a product of the fascist movement and it shouldn't be allowed to hide behind feminism.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Oh, please don't misunderstand. I am not defending these "tradwife"-obsessed psychos...

I just wanted to point out that there is nothing inherently wrong with that lifestyle, as long as the person chooses to live that way.

[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Its partly a reaction against the financial freedoms women have started to enjoy since they started getting closer to male salaries and a career became a more socially acceptable option for women. In the past if you were a woman you had to marry to get your own place, it was also deeply socially unacceptable for women to remain unmarried into their twenties and thirties, so far more women had to marry men who never really the right choice for them, witness the high divorce rates for the tail end of this group as divorce became easier and more socially acceptable. I would also add its also more socially acceptable for people to be out and in relationships now, rather than marrying a beard or playing full on pretend. This further cuts the pool who needed to marry men rather than wanted to marry men.

Now women can remain single or in more flexible arrangements and a large group of men are now struggling to adapt. Large elements of this group have been targeted by the likes of Crowder for rationalisation and end up on the incel pathway. A trad wife is a fantasy that makes everything easy for this group of men, its going to be attractive to them.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

They would hate my household. My wife is much better educated than I am and has always made a lot more money than I do and we have had to go down to a single income so I can help my daughter through online school. We can afford it- just barely, but we can afford it. Total reversal of gender roles.

We've done it twice before. Once when we kept her home and did online school during COVID and once from when she was a baby to age three. I was the one staying home with the kid those two times too.

They'd probably want to throw me in prison for that or something.

[-] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah, reality ends up like my ex, who wanted a tradwife who also makes the bulk of the money for him to spend.

And no, I knew none of that beforehand.

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I think the principle is popular enough - though certainly not for everyone (it's probably not even close).

The impracticality of surviving on a single income makes the idea laughable, and I wonder how much of its popularity is actually a desire to live a comfy life on a single income - maybe a few kids too.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

So really, it's aspirational. Like a hummer in every driveway sort of thing.

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I grew up conservative Christian and have some friends in traditional marriages, although they are liberals politically, but it's pretty different from what these grifters sell it as, even Crowder who presumably did it "the right way." The expectation of the man in this arrangement is something these grifters love to gloss over. "The man should lead" means they are leaders in a church community in their free time, the wife is too, everyone knows each other's business to a degree, problems are discussed in small men's groups or women's Bible study etc. It's really not a commodified lifestyle which these grifters sort of treat it as, it's a lot of sacrifice. They sell it here as this easy thing but the ones I know who make it work don't treat it that way.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
406 points (92.3% liked)

politics

18973 readers
3641 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS