this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
393 points (97.8% liked)

News

23310 readers
3914 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 123 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Following that logic if you’re sovereign then it’s not really a riot or insurrection. It’s another nation engaging in war with another nation. The election wasn’t any of their business to begin with since they’re sovereign.

That “sovereign citizen” just lost a war against arguably the most powerful nation on the globe.

Fucking moron. I hope he’s able to grow and learn from this experience in a positive way. 🤷‍♂️

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 65 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I've never heard of a SovCit that isn't a fucking moron unless they're a grifter. Anyone with a lick of sense would be able to figure out their beliefs are all silly.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Well I don't see a flag with gold fringe anywhere, so your words have no power here.

[–] Froyn@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

"Do you have a flag?" --Eddie Izzard

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Haha, I forgot about that one. They do say that.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The whole thing started as a mail order scam targeting poor black communities, especially obviously people charged with crimes, who are desperate enough to believe this stuff will work. They think they are buying legal magic words that will make courts do whatever they want.

There's a seminal case from Canada that lays out their history and categorizes their arguments, it's worth the read just for the great research and writing, but it provides a playbook for judges and lawyers to properly dispose of these cases. They used to be a nightmare when they first came around because they would grind things to a halt. Now courts know how to handle it and they are some of the easier cases to dispose.

Here's the case: only 200 pages, ha! https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.html

Calls them OCPA litigants: Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

SovCits are what happens when people are willing to believe anything that makes their opinion right, and ignore anything that proves them wrong.

They use the law as a shield, but the second they want to break the law, they say it doesn't matter.

If someone showed up at their house and claimed it was now their house due to annexation, they'd be on the phone to the cops faster than you could imagine.

They want everyone else to follow the rules, and for them to do anything they want.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If someone showed up at their house and claimed it was now their house due to annexation, they’d be on the phone to the cops faster than you could imagine.

They actually have tried that (more than once) and it was harder to evict them than you would think.

Police had tried multiple times to get the squatters to leave the home, including using a helicopter and armored vehicles, The Sun reported. They were able to get a search warrant after pulling over Michael Lawrence Warren, one of the squatters, for a traffic stop and discovering his identity and criminal history, which included sex offenses.

https://www.insider.com/sovereign-citizens-moved-into-15-million-mansion-in-maryland-2021-7

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's different. That's squatters rights. All you have to do to claim squatters rights is occupy the home to the exclusion of the true owner under a claim of right. Bam, it's instantly a matter of landlord tenant law and you're entitled to summary process (eviction proceedings). Sometimes they can jam that up but it eventually goes through. Then the sheriff or whoever has to serve the eviction. They often combine their squatting with false entries into the land records. That's when it gets hard.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

In the United States, squatting is illegal and squatters can be evicted for trespassing.[36] Real estate managers recommend that vacant properties be protected by erecting "no trespassing" signs, regular checks, tenant screening, and quickly finding new tenants.[45] In Miami, municipal ordinance requires that property owner exercise all legal means to remove squatters and police are empowered to take actions to remove squatters from private property and then bill the owner or lessee.[46]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squatting_in_the_United_States#Legal

There is no such thing as squatter's rights in the United States.

[–] silverbax@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, I don't know why people keep posting that on Reddit and Lemmy. Having been a former landlord, eviction is not difficult, it's just that some inexperienced landlords are not aware of the laws. You own the property, If someone moves in without an agreement from you, you evict them, or more accurately, you have them charged with breaking and entering, plus trespassing.

I once rented to a couple where the boyfriend became verbally abusive and would throw things at his girlfriend during arguments. The thing is, he wasn't on the rental agreement, she was. He refused to leave, I laughed and had his ass out within 3 hours.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like the reason it was hard is because of our own existing laws and not anything they're claiming with their sovereign citizenship stuff.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but basically the law is on their side for once.

[–] don@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I hope he’s able to grow and learn from this experience…

That’s some heroic optimism right there

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Legendary really

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but according to the article he apologized to one of the officers he attacked, so they should just let him go.