this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
123 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's good to know the evangelicals chomping at the bit for a posting in a nuclear silo are going to pestilence themselves out of the picture before they get a chance to force armageddon.

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I think I also read somewhere that a lot of our nuclear stockpile has decayed to subcritical levels and can't actually detonate anymore and we're not sure how much of it is in that state

EDIT: No single source, on further research it appears that the cores decay in unpredictable ways that can affect how they explode, and the program for recycling them isn't running properly and we can't do underground nuclear testing anymore to check samples of stockpiles so they're kind of in the dark on which ones need recycling. If anything it's the hardware in the warheads themselves that will break down faster over time and since it's the United States of America maintaining the warheads they're overbudget and behind schedule and not even sure which warheads need maintaining first.

Regardless the technology for shooting down missiles has improved a lot since the end of the Cold War so hopefully if anyone is insane enough to actually launch missiles they'll be destroyed before they can cause any damage

Please find this source, I need a little hope.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I should've guessed that "Russia's nukes are probably all old and falling apart anyway" was yet more projection

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I'm sure theirs are too. The problem is that there is no profitable way to maintain a nuclear arsenal

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

no profitable way to maintain a nuclear arsenal

I hate that it's important to maintain a "everyone dies" card, seeing as the only country we'd use nukes against would be a country powerful enough to have their own nukes, and these are getting fired for the sole purpose of ensuring that literally everyone goes out with us. I get that they're also deterrents, but the deterrent here is that this is our "everyone dies" card; I genuinely doubt any other nation would be the first to fire a nuke.