302
Mike Johnson to publicly release 44,000 hours of sensitive January 6 footage
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
302 points (98.4% liked)
News
23311 readers
4549 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
then you're not paying attention.
The security tapes reveal how [all the people you mentioned] responded to the first attempt. It'll also show the evacuation routes, which are extremely difficult to change, where the safe rooms are, which is also incredibly difficult to change, where all the cameras are, the weak points.
from the insurrectionist point of view, it's intelligence material to use for training. From the point of view as someone whose spent a lifetime in contract security, releasing it is a fucked up thing to do. It's basic common sense that you don't release broad swaths of your security recordings to the general public. We all watched it happen live on the news. There's absolutely no reason to release the vast majority of these recordings.
They intentionally weren't in place the first time thanks to Trump. They will be from Biden. If Trump wins again, he won't rely on this Hail Mary method again. He'll seize power a different way.
*I'm not saying it's good to release them, I just can't see all that much coming from it.
Eh. there will be changes, sure. nat guard will be in place. they'll probably have insurmountable fencing instead of the stupid event-crowd-control stuff; they'll probably have more bodies actually on duty, etc.
most of the reasons you don't want to release the tapes remain the same- especially evacuation routes and shelters. Would a second attempt be successful? probably not. but that's why they want it- and why we shouldn't give it to them.
I do think you give Trump too much credit. he doesn't care how many people he gets killed as long as he gets power. and he's not exactly... intelligent.
I agree you don't want to compromise any security info, but this is the last, last, last, last line of defence. If it gets to that point you had several colossal fuck ups that all aligned. What happened on Jan 6 was an ad hoc defence from the scattered mess that happened to be around (and which did not actively open the doors to "protestors").
I edited my first comment, you have FBI operations, wire tapping, infiltrations, etc. Security starts way before it gets to the Capitol grounds.
As for Trump, he'll start the hunt way before Jan 6.
Your logic is like a like that of a Bond villain. Sure I revealed the evil plan to the one guy who can stop me, but he was totally tied to a laser beam table about to be sawed in half. But what ends up happening every time? The guy gets out of the laser beam table and stops the villain's plans, none of which would've been known if they would've just shut up.
It's more like knowing there are layers. It's like a construction hard hat being the absolute last safety measure, not the first. It won't save you from a huge beam falling on your head. Instead you have safety plans to make sure that doesn't happen in the first place.
What revealed here is like an ad hoc hard hat. It's not the layers and layers of security before that.