this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
536 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2751 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Membership is declining at the gun right's group as it also faces financial difficulties. Critics say the future looks bleak.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 211 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Good. The modern NRA has been the worst thing for guns rights in years. Wayne LaPierre can rot in hell.

[–] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 78 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It'd be one thing if they were only opposed by people for more gun control, but they aren't even really good at their core mission. All they do is simp for the GOP, even when doing so runs counter to their stated agenda.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 88 points 1 year ago (1 children)

all they do is ~~simp~~ launder money to the GOP for the Russians.

Fixed it for ya.

[–] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

JFC, really? I'm not up on the latest NRA lore but that sounds too bad to be true.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44885633.amp

This article is a bit old, after it was written Butina went back to Russia and is now a member of theit legislature.

[–] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep reading and it keeps getting worse. HOW?

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

HOW?

well, citizens united mostly, but also because the GOP knows no shame, even dead children and collaborating with the russians.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

citizens united. Those justices have decided to be on the infamous side of history.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The NRA is a marketing team for gun manufacturers, and what sells guns is fear of gun bans. The NRA does everything in their power to fuel those fears.

Pro and anti gun alike hate them. It's mostly just boomers keeping them going.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They aren't a gun rights organization. They aren't even a manufacturer's organization. They are Republican shills, first, last, and always.

I was finally convinced they had abandoned gun owners when they endorsed Mitt Romney in 2012. When a gun rights organization openly endorses the signer of a gun ban, there is something deeply wrong.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did they endorse Reagan, too? He signed a gun ban.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That was slightly before my time, but yes, they did endorse Reagan in 1980 and 1984, and Reagan had signed the Mulford Act 13 years earlier. The Mulford act wasn't a gun ban per se; it prohibited carry of loaded firearms without a permit.

Reagan went on to support the Brady Bill and the 1994 AWB after his presidency. Reagan also banned carry in national parks. Clinton and 2 Bushes didn't undo that mistake; Obama fixed it in his first month in office.

But I digress: the NRA has done far more for the Republican Party than it has done for gun rights.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

the NRA has done far more for the Republican Party than it has done for gun rights

It's the same story with evangelical groups like Focus on the Family: They're just shills for Republicans, and are actively hurting their religion in the process.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

That sudden ray of light is Huey P smiling.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I belonged to the NRA way back when they were a safety and information organization. They began to sell high priced commemorative hunting guns, then commemorative military guns. Soon they started selling military style guns like the M1 Garand rifle and the M1 carbine. I quit. Their push continued into modern M16s while simultaneously pushing scare articles to convince people of dangers so great that they would need buy military style weapons. The NRA degenerated into a money and greed operation that became the opposite of its origins intent.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They've even wormed their way into schools. They have "Eddie the Eagle" that teaches elementary school kids gun safety. With NRA logos all over the place, of course. I was disgusted when my daughter brought the information home.

Absolutely kids should be taught gun safety. They just shouldn't get it with a heaping helping of NRA.

[–] skeeter_dave@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gun safety was one of their original missions and where quite successful at it before they turned into a fear mongering lobbying group.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Someone else needs to do it now. But I'm guessing the NRA gives school systems plenty of money to use their program.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Eddie the Eagle

There can be only one.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say it started with Harlan Carter. He was the one who decided that the NRA should be all about the profits of gun manufacturers, and not about safe and sane gun culture.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gun culture is just a different and insane thing in the US. We have a bit of it in Canada and gun issues in the cities, but guns are highly regulated here, maybe too much in some specific aspects. I'm in favor of less restrictions for historical pieces similar to historical cars where you can apply for that status.

Where I'm from lots of people have guns but there's not really a gun culture, they're basically used for animal defense. Last incident I know of was a deliriously sick coyote getting in to a horse paddock in daylight.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The NRA changed American thinking from "guns are tools that we sometimes need for protection" to "GUNS ARE THE ONLY THING PROTECTING YOUR FAMILY AND YOUR FREEDOM!!!1!!!".

They can rot in hell.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You just know there's so many Americans with guns who can't wait to kill someone for the right reason in the most violent way, it's like their fantasy.

I was listening to an American at a work outing once who got inspected at the Canadian border, and she was ranting about how they thought she had a gun and were checking everywhere. I'm sympathizing cause that sucks, then she's like "but they never checked my purse where I kept my gun!" and it's like fuck sakes woman, you certainly made your point...