this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
275 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Musk over here trying to conflate gender-affirming hormone medication being taken by 16-17 year olds with the mutilation of children's genitalia.

This is thinly veiled hate speech. They are straw-manning those they see as "other", for the purpose of placing themselves in a morally superior position. It is arguably defensible lies (I didn't mean, I just meant...), functioning as a dogwhistle to manufacture outrage over imagined extremes that aren't actually happening, all to stir hatred in the public against LGBTQ+ people and ideologies. And they cap it off with a call to action.

This is painfully similar to how hate speech against the Jewish people started.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

This is painfully similar to how hate speech against the Jewish people started.

"The Cultural Marxists are promoting deviant behaviour to weaken Western Civilization."

"The Jews are promoting deviant behaviour to weaken the Aryan Race."

Yeah these guys are saying the same things now as were being said a hundred years ago. And lately a lot of people are dropping the code words.

We know what this kind of thing led to in the past.

So yeah, it's very painfully similar.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know this will be an unpopular opinion in this thread but this isn't hate speech in Canada. It's a vile perspective shared by someone with many impressionable followers but it's not hate speech. Labeling this exchange as hate speech weakens this term and is not useful in shifting discourse or people's opinions.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When you use the phrase, "hate speech in Canada," it is clear you are using the specific legal standard for criminal speech in Canada. That is not the only definition of hate speech. More generally, anything intended to express or incite hatred is hate speech, it need not be legally found to be a crime.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nearly any discourse can be considered hate speech using your broad definition. And when everything is hate speech nothing is hate speech, it loses it's usefulness as a term. Let's use accurate language

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Let's deal with that problem if it comes up. And it never fucking has. But meanwhile we have had the converse problem an AWFUL lot of times.

If you cannot recognize and boldly denounce hate, that's a you problem, and you need to deal with it. If you cannot recognize these specific tweets as expression of hate, then just fuck off and leave the rest of us alone.

Like seriously, you're more concerned with some abstract "purity of the language" issue than opposing actual hate that is actually hurting people you probably know by simplycalling it hate.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't straw man and then get aggressive about opinions I obviously don't hold. Feel free to ask questions if something is unclear. These kinds of disingenuous discources are part of the problem.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Straw man, my ass. You refuse to call hate hate.