this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
609 points (100.0% liked)

196

16490 readers
2778 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 103 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Hot take: none. Let information flow free. Take it with the good and the bad. Don't lock yourself in an echo chamber.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 95 points 1 year ago (3 children)

i never understood this take. echo chambers aren't inherently bad; forced debates are never good. communities are supposed to be places you go to feel comfortable not where you'd forced to debate or turn anything into an argument.

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Exposure to other viewpoints is good. No need to debate. And if you’re on a large instance, you’ll see that. Not everyone thinks alike, there are shades of gray. Discussion is allowed to happen but intolerance isn’t tolerated.

The tankie instances ban anyone for even asking questions politely that they don’t agree with. It’s a total monoculture and I assume they’re mostly still kids, because everything is black and white and can be solved without any nuance at all.

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Exposure to other viewpoints is good yes, but is it good when that exposure only ever gets you insults hurled your way from the people you’re trying to have a discussion with?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago

exactly. everywhere irl all i see is people debating my existence. i just want one place where i don't have to think about that. x.x

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Nope, definitely not - which is why I’m not a free speech absolutist. Let those instances sit on an island by themselves.

[–] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is exposure to other viewpoints good when those viewpoints are half-baked straw man hot-takes that the users are just parroting because they heard their favorite YouTuber say it?

I don’t need to be exposed to yet another dipshit who insists the holodomor never happened. That’s not me avoiding other viewpoints, that’s me avoiding fucking morons.

[–] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is very close to the Nazi point of "just asking questions" or when they say it's just free speech. Not saying you're arguing it, but it is a very thin line.

What's the line then? Why do people ban Nazis and not tankies? Tankies are authoritarian, they defend the massacre of Ukrainians, the Uyghur genocide, and other historic "socialist" atrocities. Why do we give them leeway? Are they skirting the line just enough? Are they intentionally using the optics of socialism to do so? Etc.

Keep in mind, just because someone blocks someone or an instance it doesn't necessarily make the space an echo chamber. We don't know if they live in a state or work in a place that is blasting Fox News 24/7. They may be very active on Twitter exposed to that sewage. Heck, the liberal point of view is quite a lot as is with the way they are defending Israel.

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I’m arguing the exact opposite. We should ban/defederate nazis and tankies. But we shouldn’t ban people with different views that aren’t beyond the pale.

You can have a nuanced opinion of Israel/Palestine without being labeled as a genocide denier since it’s still in the fog of war.

It’s much harder to have a nuanced opinion about Rohingya, the Holocaust, Uyghur, Darfur.

[–] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I like your response. I don't have much else to add.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I assume they’re mostly still kids, because everything is black and white and can be solved without any nuance at all.

This is SO important. Remember that the "Dirtbag Left" a la Chapo et al. was created when the Alt Right was running rampant in high schools. Their goal was to attract young people to the left. Which is great! There's a place for cringe edgy teens to feel like they can fight for a better world. But I'm really not looking to hang out with arrogant teenagers right now, and definitely not with their emotionally immature adult chaperones.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

The fact that they are mostly kids is a big part of the reason why I feel the need to add context to their bad political science.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes questions have answers.

Exposure over and over won't be novel, or helpful, just grating. We do not need to endlessly rehash every possible argument, over and over and over and over and over.

[–] Nerorero@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Even if the other viewpoint is that trans people should get shot or locked up and are members of a secret child sex ring? I don't think I want that on my feed. I don't want people that want to kill me on my screen while I shit

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nope, not at all. All that falls into the intolerant and intolerable category.

Defending capitalism or Israel - or even suggesting that both sides might have agendas - will get you banned in quite a lot of subs here.

[–] Nerorero@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

Okay, but this is more about blocking instances that are very extreme. Those can most of the time not be discussed with

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yukichigai@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

90% of the time it's bigots who are upset that they're getting deplatformed. The other 10% of the time it's the incredibly idealistic or naive. Either way it's a crap argument. You are under no obligation to endure verbal diarrhea, nor is it your responsibility to change the minds of the people spewing it. They shit the bed, they can lie in it.

[–] WillFord27@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Normal interactions with normal communities will be plenty of diversity, there's absolutely no reason to engage with or listen to nazis. Right wing politics has mastered brainwashing, it's dangerous to read that shit too often.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They've mastered brainwashing to conservative religious nutjobs and incels. Maybe young and naive teenage boys, on top of that. If you aren't an idiot or a teen, you should be immune for the most part.

Not that I'm saying you should go out of your way to interact with Nazis. Unless the interaction involves punching.

[–] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

If you aren’t an idiot or a teen you should be immune for the most part.

Yes but the problem is between idiots and teens you’ve covered about 70% of the population.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hot take indeed.

If the dog shits on the floor you don't just start walking around it, you clean the floor.

[–] Automated_Footprint@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not a good analogy because then blocking the instance is like killing the dog.

Not at all, it's just making it so the dog has to shit outside in a particular spot you never have to walk through

What? No it's not. If I block an instance it's still up and running, I just don't see any of it. It's like if I put on a selective blindfold.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also a valid solution to the poop on the carpet problem.

Just saying

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yes I need to see the fascists masquerading as leftists otherwise I would be living in an echo chamber....

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They'll certainly bring up an actual good point from time to time, unlike actual fascists.

Mostly though you can negate the majority of their most obnoxious shit takes by blocking users.

But my instance isn't federated with Lemmygrad and Hexbear as is so I can get away with that, and I don't see "Genocide is okay if" takes in my feed.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'll certainly bring up an actual good point from time to time, unlike actual fascists.

and a broken clock shows the correct time twice a day doesn't mean it's useful to have it taking up space on the wall.

also they are actual fascists. in the chapo trap house community I literally got the reply "ukraine should be destroyed at all costs"

Well, as long as we judge entire communities by the actions of individuals.

Thanks for the nuance. While I agree that tankies can be annoying, I think it's stupid to compare them to fascists with the whole "red fash" thing. Just because they have some terrible takes of their own, it doesn't make them fascist.

The worst of them do deny genocides, which is terrible, but they do it out of a habit of denying anything western powers claim actually happened. I imagine many of their members are trolls and contrarians, as well. Despite this, like you said, some of them have decent takes and not all of them are off the deep end, yet

[–] Floey@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

People who say this are generally fine being a part of every other instance that is full of liberals who repeat fascist propaganda verbatim. Seen rather clearly in response to the recent escalations in Gaza.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago

Not so hot take: My time is finite, why force myself to see shitty facebook memes, dog pictures, crusty "battlestations", etc.?

[–] tastysnacks@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Hexbear kind of pissed me off for a week. But I kind of like how nakedly transparent they are. Now, whenever I come across one of those threads, I see where its coming from and I relax. They're just pro-russia regardless of if it makes sense. I don't know what the Murica equivalent of Russia is, but they're that

What fucking kills me is they're like 80% American teenagers who have never even been to Europe or Asia, but simp hard for Russia and China

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

They're anti US, not necessarily pro Russia. They support Russia in the Russia-Ukraine war because they think Ukraine is a US puppet state because the country wants to align with Western nations, and of course no nation on earth has its own agency and everything is the US's fault. They're pro anything that challenges the US and other liberal countries.

They remind me of a bunch of teenagers trying to be edgy.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

They are campists. It's been the bane of leftist parties forever. That's why socialism really got a foothold in Europe via third-way social democracy, because it doesn't feel the need to make tyrants into folk heroes in order to relitigate the cold war

[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Vatnik.

Do they support Russia or Putin? If they support one, they hate another.

[–] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would you say the same when someone is harassing you? Or how about if they were Nazis? Because keep in mind OP is just blocking them and not removing them from all of lemmy.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

OP is asking which ones to block because he currently is not being harassed. If he was being harassed, he would know which ones to block.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I can't read German or french

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are missing out on all the sturgeon jokes!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tugboater203@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Same here, but every now and then an English source comes through so I keep them available.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Oh mein Gott er kann kein Deutsch lesen grundgütiger wie kann man das nicht können c'est incroyable, non c'est impossible je voudrait penser mais non

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

That'd be fine if the tankie takes had any value to them. The only value they've added to me is showing me why real world communism has always ended up the way it has. And now I've learned that lesson, so theres no further value

[–] MycoBro@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I have no need for those weird anime fan clubs. Like that chainsaw shit. Or holo-whatever

[–] Tugboater203@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I disagree, I would love to block NSFW instances, and I'm grateful to the users that voluntarily post in there. For me Lemmy is too searchable for me to get into those luxuries.

[–] CJOtheReal@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Your instance is one of the most oppressive regarding that...

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

My hot take is: Depending on the individual, this may be a healthy and responsible thing to do. The outrage cycle that was established in commercial social media to "drive engagement" is very bad for our meat computers (shown in multiple studies). It is much healthier and more productive, at times, to block users, communities, and potentially instances (removing this ability, and forcing me to use their algorithm for sorting, is why I left Reddit, in addition to the harm caused to disabled communities).

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

This was the attitude I admired on reddit, until it got overrun by Nazis.

I was wrong.